Page 24 - rise 2017
P. 24

Table V
             Test Results of Water Samples
                  Parameter         Unit                  Water Samples
                                             Unfiltered      Filter 1       Filter 2
                     pH              -          6.98          6.87           8.88
                                              (Class I)      (Class I)      (Class I)
                     TSS            mg/l        83             17             22
                                             (Class III)     (Class I)      (Class I)
                     COD            mg/l        47             22             20
                                             (Class III)     (Class II)    (Class II)
               Oil & Grease (O&G)   mg/l       1920            44             44

             Table  VI  shows  the  percentage  reduction  of  the  water  samples.  The  percentage  reduction  was
             calculated to get the efficiency of the filters.

             Table VI
             Percentage of Reduction
                 Parameter               % Reduction
                                    Filter 1      Filter 2
                    pH               1.6           -27.0
                    TSS              79.5          73.5
                    COD              53.0          57.5
              Oil & Grease (O&G)     97.7          97.7

             Results from Table V and Table VI show that filter 1 and filter 2 have the same efficiency of 97.7% in
             removing oil and grease. Both filters have efficiently reduced the oil and grease content from 1920
             mg/l to 44 mg/l. However, the value is still fall short from meeting the 5 mg/l required value given by
             the guideline [11]. Perhaps, a second filtration may help to reduce further the O&G value to meet the
             requirement.  The  unfiltered  sample  is  slightly  acidic  with  a  pH  value  of  6.98.  After  filtration,  pH
             value of filter 1 and filter 2 samples are 6.87 and 8.88 respectively. The pH value of samples from
             filter 1 is more acidic whilst from filter 2 is more alkali. Total suspended solid was reduced from 83
             mg/l in unfiltered sample to 17 mg/l in Filter 1 and 22 mg/l in Filter 2 samples (see Table 5). The
             initial value of COD is 47 mg/l; after treatment, the value for filter 1 is 22 mg/l and filter 2 is 20 mg/l.
             The percentage of oil and grease decrease by 98%, while COD and TSS decreased by 57% and 73%,
             and pH increased by 27% respectively.

             Conclusion and Recommendation
             This  study  has  shown  that  banana  fiber  has  a  potential  to  be  used  as  an  adsorbing  medium  for  a
             removal of oil and grease in wastewater. Filter 1 is effective in the removal of suspended solids and
             oil and grease but slightly lower performance in the COD removal of the wastewater compared to
             filter 2. Filter 2 shows higher pH than filter 1 probably due to calcium carbonate. However further
             investigations is needed on performance of banana fiber as an absorbent to achieve higher percentage
             of removal for oil and grease to satisfy Design Effluent Values [11]. A repeat or second filtration is
             recommended to be tested to achieve the required O&G removal.

             References
             [1] I. A. F. Husain, F. Alkhatib, M. S. Jammi, M. E. S. Mirghani, Z. Bin Zainudin, and  A. Hoda,
             “Problems , Control , and Treatment of Fat , Oil , and Grease ( FOG ): A Review,” vol. 752, no. 8, pp.
             747–752, 2014.
             [2]  A. M.  Z.  Alade  A.  O.,  Jameel  A.T., Muyubi  S. A.,  Abdul  Karim M. I.,  “Removal  of  Oil  and
             Grease As Emerging Pollutants of Concern ( Epc ) in Wastewater Stream,” IIUM Eng. J., vol. 12, no.
             4, pp. 161–169, 2011.
             [3] S. J. Kulkarni, “An Insight into Oil and Grease Removal from Wastewater from Petroleum and
             Refinery Industries,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2016.
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29