Page 11 - Professorial Lecture - Prof Nengomasha
P. 11

Namibia records management programme is guided by the Archives Code, a
        local standard for records management modelled on the international records
        management standard ISO15489  first edition of 2001.   A 2016  second  edition
        of ISO 15489 recognises the increase in records being made and kept in digital
        environments, offering a range of opportunities for new kinds of use and reuse.
        Digital environments also allow greater flexibility in the implementation of records
        controls, within and between systems that manage records. If the annual reports
        are to go by, the public service of Namibia Archives Code and subsequently the
        records management programme have not been revised to align with this new
        revised standard.

        The records management programme was reported to be efficient in the 1900s,
        a situation that changed in the late 1990s. This was mostly attributed to the exit
        of trained and skilled staff at independence, who were replaced by untrained
        and unskilled  staff as the public  service  of Namibia addressed  “imbalances
        of the past” (Lau, 1994). This is contrary to best practice which require that
        this function be carried out by specialists. Studies in the early 2000s on records
        management show persistence of poor records keeping in the public service of
        Namibia. Barata et al. (2001) observed that there was no active government-
        wide records management programme which would normally be coordinated
        through the National Archives, and Nengomasha and Amiss (2002), the
        Ministry of Basic Education, Sport and Culture (2004) and Nengomasha (2004)
        supported this observation. Mazikana (2007) identified Namibia’s public service
        as one of those struggling with records and archives management. A more
        recent study by Matongo (2021) on managing records for discharge of justice
        in Namibia highlighted similar findings, concluding that the current state of
        records management practices was likely to impede the discharge of justice
        and recommended the following: a records management policy; hiring trained
        and qualified records management staff; records management buy-in from all
        stakeholders involved in the processes of the justice system. Challenges which
        hinder  the records management programme include  the management of
        public service registries by administration officials who lack records management
        training and skills thereby hampering the effective management of records. These
        challenges are not limited to Namibia basing on Ngoepe and Keakopa’s (2011)
        conclusion on South Africa and Botswana that the management of public sector
        records was a daunting task, citing inadequate financial resources and failure to
        retain skilled staff as some of the challenges the two countries faced.  On archives
        administration and management, the NAN annual reports highlight acquisition,
        appraisal and processing of archival materials, and digitisation. Appraisal is one
        of the challenges which the National Archives has highlighted in the past, which
        according to the NAN annual reports has since taken off. As regards archives

        Transformation of Records & Archives Management in the Public Service of Namibia  11
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16