Page 14 - HaMizrachi YmYm 2020 FLIPv3
P. 14

Dr. Yael Ziegler







          “And It Was in the Days of the Judging of the Judges”

               The Problem of Leadership                                                                 1






             he initial verse of the book of   sinning, “Take out the splinter from   order. Malbim thereby resolves the
             Ruth draws our attention to    between your teeth!” The litigant’s   question of the vague description of
      Tthe book’s negative setting.         insolent response, “Take out the beam   the time-period and simultaneously
       Its inaugural word,  vayehi (an      from between your eyes,” is a refer-  depicts this era’s social turmoil.
       onomatopoeic  word  that  sounds     ence to more egregious sins commit-
       like a lament),  tends to introduce a   ted by the judge himself. The society   This opening verse focuses our atten-
                    2
       calamity.  This phrase is immediately   depicted  by  this  interpretive  reading   tion on the problem of leadership
               3
       followed  by  a   second   vayehi,   is chaotic, lacking a viable judicial   at the opening of the Book of Ruth.
       introducing a famine, which is also   infrastructure. Not only do the people   The backdrop of this book recalls
       a dependable indicator of Divine     disrespect the judges, refusing to heed   the chaotic leadership of the end of
       displeasure and Israel’s disobedience. 4  their instructions, but the judges   the period of the judges, which lacks
                                            themselves are not worthy of respect!   monarchy. The solution for this era
       The full phrase  vayehi bimay (and it                                     appears at the end of the Book of
       was in the days of) may further hint   Ibn Ezra offers a similar reading,   Ruth, which concludes with the birth
       at the adverse setting of the book,   but  with  a  twist.  He  posits  that  the   of David, the founder of a dynasty of
       drawing our attention to the absence   double  language indicates  that  G-d   Judean kings.
       of  monarchy.  This  exact  phrase   judged the judges at this time, and it
       appears  four  additional  times  in   was due to the poor conduct of the
       Tanach,  always prefacing a negative   judges that G-d brought a famine   1   This essay has been adapted (with
              5
       time-period. However, in every other   upon the land. Ibn Ezra’s approach     permission from the publisher) from Yael
                                                                                     Ziegler,  From Alienation to Monarchy
       case, the phrase  vayehi bimay pre-  has a syntactical advantage, in that     (Jerusalem: Maggid, 2015).
       cedes the introduction of a king. The   he explains the connection between   2   This  word seems  to  comprise  two
       replacement of a king with this vague   the opening phrase, “And it was in    expressions of moaning:  vai and  hee
                                                                                     (commensurate with the better-known
       judging of the  judges highlights the   the days of the judging of the judges,”   expression “oy vey”).
       absence of monarchic leadership, a   and the next sentence, “And there was   3   Megillah 10b; Ruth Rabbah,  Petichta 7;
       key factor that foments chaos during   a famine in the land.” Moreover, he    Genesis Rabbah 42:3; Leviticus Rabbah
       this period. 6                       provides a theological justification for   11:7; Esther Rabbah, Petichta 11.
                                            the famine, which is introduced in the   4   See,  e.g.,  Leviticus  26:18–20;
       Who are these judges and whom are    narrative with no causal explanation.    Deuteronomy 11:16–17. The  Targum on
                                                                                     Ruth 1:1 notes explicitly that this famine is
       they judging? Commenting on the                                               a punishment.
       double language, the Gemara (Bava    Malbim addresses the vague descrip-  5   Genesis 14:1; Isaiah 7:1; Jeremiah 1:3;
       Batra 15b) treats the noun as the    tion of the time-period. He maintains    Esther 1:1. A Midrash displays its
       object of the infinitive, suggesting   that during the period of the Book of   customary literary sensitivity by noting
                                                                                     that all five of these verses have this
       that  the  judges  are  being  judged  by   Ruth, there is no central leadership.   opening in common (Ruth Rabbah,
       the people. This is both a comment   Instead, this is a period between the    Petichta 7).
       on the rebelliousness of  the people,   authoritative judges, when anyone   6   Note the refrain that bemoans the absence
       who do not accept the judges’ author-  who wished to rule seized control,     of monarchy in the final tumultuous
                                                                                     chapters of the book of Judges (17:6, 18:1;
       ity, and a negative assessment of the   and  unauthorized  judges  proliferated   19:1; 21:25).
       judges, who  deserve  judgment.  The   throughout  the  land,  doing  as  they
       Gemara characterizes the judges in   pleased. As we know from the end
       the following anecdote: a judge rep-  of the Book of Judges, lack of cen-
       rimands a supplicant with an idiom   tral leadership generates chaos, the   Dr. Yael Ziegler teaches Tanach at leading
       intended to direct him to cease his   collapse of the religious and social   institutions in Israel



       14  |
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19