Page 74 - WHACK35
P. 74

O N E H A N D S H O U LD WA S H TH E OTH E R – A N D B OTH WA S H TH E FAC E


                                    S TI G MA , H E P C & D RUG L AW RE FO RM

                                                                                             by The Golden Phaeton

            If you don’t know, a skein is like a ball of wool.   So, business as usual in the drug law sector, but not in
                                                                 another area with which it is intimately bound. In the
            Think of the many and various responsibilities of our   health domain, brave new blood borne virus policies aim
            government as a vast intertwining skein              to eliminate hep C from Australia by 2030. Unsafe inject-
            reflecting the structure of our society at large. This   ing drug use is the primary vector of hep C and as a result
            skein is divided into departments, portfolios,       the disease is saturated with negative public stigma. This
            ministries, what have you, each with a particular    stigma is a major hurdle in bringing people to treatment,
            remit: health, finance, sport, arts etc. Though each   therefore the Victorian government has also taken aim at
            has a specific area of governance, the responsibilities   it, angling (incredibly) at its elimination by 2030.
            of one can never be fully separated from those of the
            others, or of the whole.                             I remain sceptical as to whether these targets are feasible

                                                                 yet I stand, in hope, to be corrected. The new treatments
            Pull one thread and somewhere else another will be   which have fuelled such aspirations are nigh on
            tugged. Sometimes predictably, sometimes not. Part of   miraculous, and our monolithic medical system is already
            good management is making certain that decisions in   being mobilised towards these ends as is evidenced by the
            one zone are compatible, at best synergistic, with those   recent establishment of the Elimination Council (EC).  But
            in others. Our governments do a reasonably good job   if we are to reduce stigma, then stigma should really be a
            of keeping things more or less clanking along. But the   central consideration in the formation of drug law. Why?
            skein is a juggernaut; a huge, non-linear monster – so,   Because drug law itself is a major driver of stigma. Hep C
            confusions, mix-ups, and outright contradictions     stigma radiates from societal perspectives on drug use, and
            inevitably occur. Governments are aware of this,     these perspectives are given credence by the illegality of
            surely, perhaps not in precisely the way I’m framing it,   recreational drug use.
            but nonetheless aware.
                                          H E P C I N AU S TR A LI A I S TH E C H I LD
            The looming Victorian parlia-  O F U N SA FE  I NJ E C TI N G  D R U G  U S E                              Attitudes to illegal drugs, drug
            mentary inquiry into drug law   (95% O F N E W N OT I F I C AT I O N S A R E D U E      dependence and hep C are
            has particular terms of refer-  TO S H A R E D I N J E C T I N G E Q U I P M E N T )      formed   from
            ence, but I would like to suggest                                         society’s conversations with
            an overlay. There needs to be   – TH I S I S TH E R E A S O N FO R TH E      itself on large and small
            an over-arching consideration   S TI G M A S U R RO U N D I N G H E P C –      scales, born sometimes out
            to help the policy instrument                                             of gut reaction, sometimes
            avoid working at cross-purposes   Y E T I N A S P E E C H A B O U T TH I S           out of reason -yet nothing
            with other parts of the skein                                             sculpts our attitudes to
            –        specifically, the effort to   S TI G M A , P EO P LE W H O  I NJEC T      a thing quite like its
            eliminate Hep C in Australia. I   DRU G S W E R E  NOT ME NTI O NE D.      legal standing. Legality and
            am not sure why the inquiry has                                           legal status is, in a way, our
            been called at this time. It seems relatively quiet in the   government’s way of pointing to whether a thing should
            sector. Of course it’s never really quiet in the land of   be stigmatised or not. Consider the heavy stigma
            drugs, there are always huge concerns, that’s par for   associated with having spent time in jail. Or, more
            the course, but there is none of the public hysteria   pertinently, think of the reduction in stigma helped along
            which often drives such inquiries. None of that dog-  by relaxation of laws surrounding the LGBTIQ communi-
            whistling to societal fear of The Other. Hopefully this   ties.
            is a good sign. Perhaps some sensible evidence-driven
            work will get done, safe from the slave master of the   The climate is probably not right at this time to address
            election cycle – as long as nasty personal agendas do   vast issues like Portugal-style legalisation or even
            not come into play.                                  decriminalisation, however effective that would be. But
                                                                 if reducing stigma is fed into the very bloodstream of law


          74  W H A C K P. I E D I T I O N : S P R I N G  2 0 16




     WHACK35_LYOT.indd   74                                                                                  11-Oct-16   4:25:45 PM
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79