Page 75 - WHACK35
P. 75

making, then progress could surely be made on a smaller
            scale - in the texture, in the grain and in the realm of
            human rights and basic respect.Stigma feeds on itself. If law-
            makers write their own, often unconscious, prejudices into
            law, stigma is normalised – if not encouraged. If you doubt
            that persons in power can be unaware of their own biases,
            consider this:  At the speech announcing the Victo-
            rian Government’s program for elimination of both hep C
            and the stigma surrounding it, their representative failed
            to mention people who inject drugs (PWID) even once.  An
            alien visiting from elsewhere in the galaxy could have been                    N O MAT TE R
            forgiven for wondering about the source of this stigma. Are
            tattoos taboo on this planet? Or blood transfusions?  Hep                    H OW YOU PUT
            C in Australia is the child of unsafe injecting drug use (95%              IT, D RUG  L AW IN
            of new notifications are due to shared injecting equipment)
            – this is the reason for the stigma surrounding hep C – yet               AUS TR ALIA NE E DS
            in a speech about this stigma PWID were not mentioned.                  AN OVE RHAU L IF WE
            Whether the omission was conscious or not, I suspect it
            revealed some level of revulsion towards or disapproval of                ARE TO S E RI OUS LY
            injecting drug use.How will they achieve their stigma goals,                  AT TE MP T TO
            if they cannot bear to name its cause in open discussion?
                                                                                        E LIMINATE THE
            Back to the forthcoming inquiry. Wouldn’t it be good for                HARM S A SSO CIATE D
            all if drug laws were optimised to reduce stigmatisation,
            and examined for embedded stigma originating from the                      WITH D RUG  US E .
            legislators themselves?


            The object of this article is not to make specific suggestions
            as to reforms, but to suggest that stigmatising processes be
            recognised and redressed.


            Let’s remember that recreational pleasure seeking is
            universal in humankind. In itself it is no sin. We should be
            well past the times when the warping agendas of churches
            drove our moral compass. It is only when it causes harm
            that we need to set limits.

            The stigma surrounding the use of illicit drugs is a nasty
            beast. At this particular time in our history it has become
            even nastier because it creates a barrier to a life-saving hep
            C treatment. The government has recognised this officially
            in a policy document. The government, or sections of it
            elsewhere in the skein, should be cognisant of this policy                Summary
            and bear it in mind while formulating and reforming our
            drug laws.





         PAR L I AM E N TAR Y  I N Q U I R Y  :  S U M MAR Y                                                       75




     WHACK35_LYOT.indd   75                                                                                  11-Oct-16   4:25:45 PM
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80