Page 142 - Arabian Studies (V)
P. 142

132                                      Arabian Studies V
                 reforms in an attempt to enable the state to assume responsibility
                 for its own affairs. The Sultanate’s own military force, the Muscat
                 Levy Corps (later known as the Muscat Infantry), was created, the
                 customs department reorganised and a Council of Ministers
                 formed. The effect was complicated by lack of interest on the part
                 of Sultan Taymur b. Faysal (r. 1913-31), whose major political
                 ambition was abdication.1
                   At the heart of the Sultanate’s problems was its insolvency. The
                 Sultan and many of his relatives were deeply in debt to the various
                 Indian merchants of the capital and Muscat’s financial problems
                 were compounded by the state’s inability to repay various loans
                 extended by Delhi. Budget deficits were kept within tolerable limits
                 only through major subsidies from the Government of India.
                 Although potential revenue of the state was slender, little attempt
                 had been made to increase the government’s meagre income. By
                 1924, the Goverriment of India recognised that Muscat’s steadily
                 deteriorating financial situation would be arrested only by the
                 secondment of a Financial Advisor to the state. In the course of the
                 next six years, this position was held by three individuals: B. S.
                 Thomas, S. E. Hedgcock and F. G. E. W. Alban. The action of
                 Sa‘Id b. Taymur in abolishing the office of Financial Advisor when
                 he came to power underscores the limited effect of this attempt at
                 reform and also provides an early indication of Said’s philosophy
                 of governing.
                   The activities and personalities of these advisors is worth examin­
                 ing in some detail since they wielded more power in the day-to-day
                 politics of the Sultanate than any expatriates before or since, and
                 because of their impact on Said b. Taymur. The choices open to
                 the Government of India in selecting appointees were limited, since
                 there was little inherent attraction in the position. The pay was low
                 and living conditions in Muscat were rudimentary, uncomfortable
                 and insanitary. Furthermore, the expatriate resident in Muscat was
                 almost totally isolated from his countrymen. Consequently, those
                 who took up service with the Muscat state must have harboured
                 secondary reasons. For example, the rationale behind Thomas’s
                 acceptance was clear. The post offered the lure of first-hand
                 observation and research for the explorer.2
                    Bertram Thomas'had been particularly interested in the position
                 when approached in early 1924 and had even made the trip from
                 Transjordan to Muscat for an interview at his own expense.3 The
                 position itself lacked prestige and certainly did not pay well, but
                 Thomas saw it as a golden opportunity to conduct research in the
                 area  and pursue exploration of a largely unknown corner of
                 Arabia. From the Government of India’s point of view, however,
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147