Page 146 - Arabian Studies (V)
P. 146

136                                      Arabian Studies V

               the Muscat Infantry, should temporarily replace Hedgcock while
              acting as PAM during Fowle’s upcoming four-month absence.21
                 Hedgcock’s response was an unauthorised trip to Simla (where
               the Government of India met in summer recess from Delhi) to try
               to convince the Foreign Secretary, E. B. Howell—a former PAM
               and a former superior of Hedgcock in Mesopotamia—of the merits
               of his position.22 To bolster his case, Hedgcock accused the former
               Infantry Commandant, Captain Walker, of having usurped state
               funds for his own use and Biscoe and Fowle of having deliberately
               lied to him. Howell was in no position to evaluate Hedgcock’s
               charge. Consequently, he allowed the erstwhile FA to return to
               Muscat with the authority of the Government of India to investi­
               gate the charges which he himself had brought. Despite the confu­
               sion prevailing at the time, he was no longer Financial Advisor and
               thus not an official of the Sultanate.23 In the end, Hedgcock’s
               charges against Biscoe, Fowle and Walker were dismissed as
               unfounded and/or trifling and Hedgcock left Muscat in late 1931
               to the obvious relief of the British establishment.24 Apparently the
               only individual who was left with a favourable impression of
               Hedgcock was young Sa‘Id b. Taymur, who accepted the erstwhile
               FA’s attacks on Thomas at face value. In his only public statement
               to his subjects (1968), Sa‘Id wrote ‘Whilst hopes were pinned on
               Mr. Thomas to repair what others had destroyed he completely
               ruined the finances and left them in an even sorrier state.’25
                 Unfortunately, this was not to be the last incident concerning the
               post of Financial Advisor. Hedgcock’s temporary successor,
               Captain Alban, exhibited a certain lack of consistency as well.
               After having advised against the retention of Hedgcock in May
               1931, Alban reversed himself in July and reported that he saw no
               reason why Hedgcock should not stay.26 Alban was also responsible
               for the purchase of a ‘state armoured car’, described as ‘a seven ton   i
               monstrosity which is incapable of movement other than between
               Bait-el-Felaj and Ruie village’, a distance of approximately one
               mile.27 The development of another potentially embarrassing
               contretemps between a Financial Advisor and British officialdom
               was prevented when Alban was invalided home shortly thereafter.
                 Hedgcock’s departure and Alban’s heavy workload—since he was
               Acting PAM and Commandant of the Muscat Infantry as well as
               FA—had allowed Sa‘id b. Taymur, as President of the Council of
               Ministers, to take control of the state’s finances. He was not eager
               to relinquish this newly acquired measure of independence. When
               Alban left, Sa‘id rejected a suggestion that his brother, E. C. H.
               Alban, replace him. As a consequence, there was no replacement
               and Sa‘Id remained unimpeded in that department until 1968.28
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151