Page 381 - Gulf Precis(VIII)_Neat
P. 381

6^
            Debaye and tell him to refrain from interference in matters which concerned the Chief of
            Shargah and his feudatory at Fujcyrah. The Chief of Debaye submitted the following
            explanation, that the Sheikh of Fujcyrah, being in trouble, had appealed to him for protec­
            tion against the raids of Bedouins from which the Chief of Shargah was unable to protect
            him, that he, the Chief of Debaye, asked Sheikh Sakar if he had any objection to his inter­
            ference, and, no objection being made, he took the necessary steps to keep the Bedouins
            back and recovered from them the property which had been taken. Subsequently the
            Mazaria tribe, subject to the Chief of Shargah committed raids on some subjects of Fuje-
            yrah. Communications again passed between the Chiefs of Shargah and Dcbuye, and it
            was agreed that hostilities were to cease pending a settlement of the dispute according to
            Shcra law. The Residency Agent at Shargah, in a letter to me, dated the 3rd February
            1902, confirmed the explanation given by the Chief of Debaye, and further stated that, while
            the two Chiefs of Shargah and Debaye were in communication, the Mazaria again raided
            subjects of Fujcyrah and the Chief of Debaye demanded redress from the Chief of Shargah,
            who deputed his uncle Sheikh Salim, the ex-ruler of Shargah, to discuss the matter with
            the Chief of Debaye. It was then agreed that the two Chiefs should send agents to the
            parties who were at feud ordering them to suspend hostilities and inviting them to Debaye
            for the purpose of settling their disputes according to Shcra. The invitation, however,
            does not appear to have been accepted. On receipt of the explanation given by the Chief
            of Debaye, I wrote to the Chief of Shargah informing him that the Chief of Debaye had, it
            seemed, only interfered in the interstsof peace, and I enjoined on him, his obligation to do
            justice and give protection to his feudatory at Fujevrah. I advised him to settle his diffi­
            culties with the Chief of Debaye and the Sheikh of Fujcyrah in an amicable manner, and I
            informed him that he could count upon the good offices of the Residency Agent at Shargah
            1q the matter.
               8. Early in April, I received a report from the Agent at Shargah that the Chief of
            Shargah had collected a force of about 150 Bedouins with the intention of marching against
            Fujeyrah and other places in that neighbourhood, which had come to an agreement with
            the Sheikh of Fujeyrah and had renounced the authority of the Joasmis. The Chiefs of
            Debaye and Aj man were determined to oppose this movement on the part of the Shargah
            Chief who had therefore sent a messenger to the Chief of Abu Dhabi for the purpose, it
            appears, of entring into an alliance with that Chief. The Chiefs of Shargah and Abu Dhabi
            had been on bad terms for some years past, but the Shargah messenger succeeded in bringing
            about a friendly understanding between them. The Chief of Shargah agreed to remove his
            objection to the settlement, by the Chief f Abu Dhabi, of the Sudan tribe at Zaora, and
            an offensive and defensive alliance between Shargah and Abu Dhabi was entered into.
            The Sheikh of Abu Dhabi then sent his son to endeavour to bring about a reconciliation
            between the Chief of Shargah and the Chiefs of Ajman, Debaye, and Um-el-Kowein
            but without success.
               9. Soon after this Major Cox, Political Agent at Maskat, visited me at Bushire.and
            informed me that Hamad-bin-Abdulla of Fujeyrah was at Muskat and had asked the Sultan
            to help him and to appoint a Wali at Fujeyrah. The Sultan, so Major Cox said, was
            apparently under the impression that Fujeyrah was independent. I accordingly wrote to
            His Highness the Sultan on the subject, and copies of my letter and of the Sultan’s reply
                    Eocloiures Not. i and 3.   are herewith forwarded for the information of
                                           Government.
               10. As Major Cox intended to visit the Batineh Coast in H. M. S. Redbreazt, I asked
                      _ . M                him to call in at Fujeyrah. A copy of Major
                       oc osure 0. 3.      Cox's report to me regarding his visit to Fujeyrah
            is herewith forwarded. Meanwhile, shortly after my arrival at Shiraz, 1 received informa­
            tion from Bushire, which led me to think that the alliance which had been entered into
            between Shargah and Abu Dhabi, consequent on the removal of the former’s objection with
            regard to Zaora, might be the cause of trouble on the Arab Coast. 1 consequently sent the
            Assistant Political Agent at Bahrein to visit the Arab Coast and to report on the slate of
            affairs. Mr. Gaskin visited the Arha Coast, in the end of May,and in his report to me,
            dated the 2nd June, he informed me that the Chief of Shragah had entered into an offensive
            and defensive alliance with the Chief of Abu Dhabi, and had consequently remorved his
            objection regarding Zaora. It was evident, however, that the Shargah Chief was well aware
            of, and, indeed, counted upon the fact that the settlement of Zaora by the Abu Dhabi Chief
            would not be allowed by the Political Resident. With regard to hujeyrah, the Chief of
            Shargah explained that he had done all in his power to conciliate the Sheikh, and had done
            his best to recover the property raided by Bedouins from Fujeyrah people, but his control
            over the Bedouins was weak. He said that the Joasmi Sheikhs greatly resented the Debaye
            Chief's interference in the matter, and that the action of the Chief of Debaye in attempting
            to gain influence over Sheikhs subordinate of Shargah was a serious menace to him and
            might result in his deposal from his position of Chief of Shargah. He was, he said, quite
            willing to meet the Sheikh of Fujeyrah in a friendly spirit and overlook his recent behaviour.
            Mr. Gaskin then proceeded to Debaye and told the Chief that it was my wish that he should
            cease to interfere in the aflairsof Fujeyrah. The Chief explained that he had only acted in
            accordance with Arab usage, and that it would be difficult for him to withdraw now, as he
            would thereby lose the confidence of the Arabs. He, however, gave Mr. Gaskin a letter to
            me in which he agreed to follow my advice and to abstain from interference in Fujeyrah
            matters, butasked me to induce the Chief of Shargah to arrange a settlement of the Fujeyrah
            Sheikh's claims.

 1
   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386