Page 133 - Su'udi Relations with Eastern Arabi & Uman (1800-1870)
P. 133

and virtually eliminated the last vestiges of their influence in the area.
           Although the Ottoman interference which led to the annexation of al-Hasa
         to the Ottoman dominions appeared to be in response to a request for help from
         ‘Abd Allah b. Faysal in subduing his rebellious brother, the Ottomans had for
         some time been considering regaining their former provinces in the peninsula
         to compensate for their territorial losses in Europe.1112 The construction and
         opening of the Suez Canal in late 1869 helped the Ottomans to use their naval
         power more efficiently and to put their decision into practice both in al-Yaman
         and in al-Hasa.1113
           In the spring of 1870, Su‘ud b. Faysal, exploiting both the animosity of the
         ‘Ujman tribes toward Amir ‘Abd Allah and the aspiration of the Banu Khalid
         to regain supremacy over their homeland, won these elements over to his side
         and resumed his armed struggle against the present regime in al-Riyad. With
         his supporters, Su‘ud besieged al-Hufuf and forced its governor to capitulate.
         Later, at Judah, a watering place near al-Hufuf, Su‘ud defeated the forces
         ‘Abd Allah had sent to repulse the assault on al-Hufuf, taking their leader,
         Muhammad b. Faysal, as prisoner to al-Qatlf.1114 Encouraged by these
         successes, Su‘ud marched toward Najd and, on the way, engaged in a series of
         skirmishes with ‘Abd Allah’s forces. Finally, in early 1871, Su‘ud took al-
         Riyad.  1115
            ‘Abd Allah fled the capital and vainly tried to enlist the support of the chiefs
         of ‘Unayzah and Ha’il, both of whom were in favour of weakening the central
         government in al-Riyad and assisting the disintegration of the Su‘udl state.
         The one saw in ‘Abd Allah’s fall and in the turmoil in the districts of Najd a
         chance to disavow Riyad authority and establish his own rule, while the other,
         similarly, did not want to miss an opportunity to consolidate his independent
         power and prepare for further expansion at the expense of the rivalry and strife
         within the Su‘udi family. ‘Abd Allah was therefore forced to seek outside
         assistance. He despatched an associate, ‘Abd al-‘Az!z b. Butayn, with a letter
         and presents to Midhat Pasha, the wall of Baghdad, inviting him to interfere in
         the conflict against Su‘ud, and offering tribute and allegiance to the Ottomans
         in return.1116 The invitation coincided agreeably with Ottoman plans for
         restoring their authority in Arabia under the ambitious expansionist
         administration of Midhat Pasha.
            Although he was anxious to respond positively to ‘Abd Allah’s request.
         Midhat Pasha did not respond immediately. Instead, he posted spies in al-Hasa
         to report on the conditions of the district, the reaction of the local inhabitants
         to the warring between the local factions, and the economic and military
         potential of the neighbouring localities.1117 Moreover, in order to provide a
          legal basis for the forthcoming expedition to al-Hasa and the possible
         encroachment upon eastern and southeastern Arabia, Midhat obtained
         authorization from the Porte for his proceedings.1118 Shortly before
         embarking, he announced his good intentions toward the inhabitants of al-
          Hasa in a manifesto explaining that Najd and its dependencies were part and
          parcel of the Ottoman empire and that their inhabitants were subject to the
          Sultan, the leader of the Muslim community.1119 The purpose of the
          expedition, Midhat explained, was to relieve the districts of disturbances and
          strife and to preserve Muslim unity. He therefore urged the people in Najd and
          al-Hasa to cooperate with the Sultan’s army, assuring the protection of their
          lives and property. Midhat also strongly criticized Su‘ud*s revolt against his

                                        127
                                                                                         !
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138