Page 61 - Su'udi Relations with Eastern Arabi & Uman (1800-1870)
P. 61

promote their influence. Al-Burayml continued to be the Su‘udl headquarters
         during the entire period of their presence in ‘Uman.407 It has an excellent
         location and is considered the inland key to that country, since it is both the
         only well-watered and self-sufficient locality in the district of al-Zahirah and
         also the crossroad of the routes leading to major towns in the Batinah
         district.408
           The developments in the Zahirah region and the consolidation of the Su‘udl
         hold on al-Burayml caused intense excitement throughout ‘Uman, and Sultan
         b. Ahmad, though preoccupied by off-and-on military operations on the coast,
         hastily gathered a tribal force together. Supported by his brother Qays, the
         governor of Suhar, he marched towards al-Zahirah to oppose the Su‘udl
         advance and, if possible, dislodge them from their position.409 Sultan found
         the Su‘udls to be well established in al-Buraymi, and his first encounter with
         the invading army resulted in his being compelled to make a truce with al-Harq
         and retire to Suhar, where he dismissed his troops.410 The truce brought a
         temporary end to hostilities between the two parties, enabling both to bid for
         broader influence and contemplate other dimensions of action. The Su‘udls
         continued to promote their influence in eastern and southeastern Arabia,
         though much of their effort was now being directed to the western frontiers in
         trying to win over the sharif of Makkah.411 The ruler of Masqat, on the other
         hand, was able to pursue his design to conquer al-Bahrayn.412 He had tried in
         1799 and succeeded in the following year, but was finally expelled two years
         later, and an end was put to his enterprise.
           Shortly after this event, hostilities between Sultan and the Su‘udls resumed
         as a result of the former’s conduct. Humiliated by the expulsion of his garrison
         from al-Bahrayn and the elimination of his power there, and at that moment in
         no position to contest the Su‘udis in al-Zahirah, Sultan designed another plan
         for the reduction of his enemy, a plan by which he consequently provoked the
         outrage and retaliation of the Dir‘Iyah authorities. Replying to a request from
         Ghalib b. Musa‘ad, the sharif of Makkah, for financial and military aid and
         cooperation in repelling the Su‘ud!s (who, at that time, were in control of most
         of western Arabia and about to bring the sacred lands under their sway), Sultan
         b. Ahmad set out with several notable ‘Uman! figures on a pilgrimage which
         was apparently dictated more by political motives than those of piety.413 He
         took with him money and ammunition for the sharif.414 He also prepared a
         military contingent and dispatched it to Juddah to join the sharif s troops.415
           The news of Sultan’s meddling in Hijaz affairs and the presence of the
         Masqat! contingent with the sharif s army exasperated the Amir ‘Abd al-AzIz.
         Soon after his return from the campaign, he declared war against Masqat and
         ordered his commander al-Harq to resume military operations in the area.416
         He also ordered his allies, the Qawasim and the ‘Utub of al-Bahrayn, to send
         out their fleet to disturb the commerce of Masqat. Al-Harq then launched a
         full-scale attack upon ‘Uman, forcing the passes of western Hajar and
          penetrating through al-Batinah.417
            The Su‘ud! state appears to have become too powerful for the ruler of
          Masqat to oppose. Finding himself alone and in a critical position, Sultan
          reached an acceptable accommodation with the Su‘udl amir.418 He dispatched
          a mission to al-Dir‘Iyah which worked out a tentative agreement on his behalf;
          hostilities would be suspended for a three year period, on the condition that an
          annual zakah of $MT 12,000 be paid to al-Dir‘Iyah and a Su‘udl political

                                         57
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66