Page 106 - Arabian Studies (II)
P. 106

96                                                Arabian Studies II

                         the Italian Ambassador, to the effect that Britain had heard of
                         ‘alleged Italian intrigues directed to the cancellation of British
                         concessions in Farasan’. The Idris! was threatening to revoke the
                         British Company’s concession and the Company had therefore
                         appealed to the British Government to intervene with ibn Sa'ud. The
                         Foreign Office was reluctant, the Ambassador was told, to pursue
                         such a course as Britain had undertaken at the Rome talks not to
                         ‘exert undue political influence on behalf of commercial interests’.
                         Such a measure would also be equivalent to British recognition of the
                         Sa‘udi-Idrlsl treaty. But the Ambassador was warned if difficulties
                         continued between the Idris! and the British Company and if the
                         intervention of the Resident in Aden was fruitless ‘we may be forced
                         to intervene with ibn Sa‘udV 09
                            At the end of September the Foreign Office, in a letter to the
                         Company, put the responsibility on the IdrlsI’s tribesmen, whom he
                         could not control. If, however, the Company’s concessions were
                         recognised by ibn Sa‘ud its position would be stronger. The Resident
                         was to be instructed to tell the IdrlsI that in the British Govern­
                         ment’s opinion his demands on the Company were unjustified. The
                         British Consul in Jeddah would be instructed to inform ibn Sa‘ud
                         that the Company accepted his offer to negotiate, but that they
                         wished to point out that they had fulfilled all their engagements and
                         that the IdrlsI’s allegations were unfounded; even Sayyid Mustafa in
                         Egypt denied any verbal agreement. Aden was then instructed to
                         support the Company’s contentions. 1 i o  On 14 September 1927 the
                         Company agreed to make concessions in the form of an advance of
                         money against the sums ultimately due under the agreement. They
                         wanted to use Sayyid Mustafa as a go-between, but were advised
                         against this course as the Sayyid was unwelcome in ‘Aslr.
                            The Foreign and Colonial Offices agreed to forward the
                          Company’s answer to the IdrlsI via the Resident in Aden who
                          himself was instructed to urge the IdrlsI to observe the terms of his
                          agreement and additionally to explain to ibn Sa‘ud the Company’s
                          position in the hope that this would prevent a breach.  i i i
                            On 16th September ibn Sa‘ud’s adviser on Yemen and ‘Aslr visited
                          the British Consul in Jeddah and suggested that when Sayyid Musfafa
   ;                      had acted as intermediary between the Company and the IdrlsI he
                          had made promises that the Company would supply the tribes with
                          arms. Although this committment was unauthorised, the tribes still
                          felt that it ought to be kept. He acknowledged that Italian agents
                          were at the root of the trouble — an Italian company having offered
                          £50,000 for the concession.
                            Negotiations began in Jlzan with Wolfson representing the
                          Company, and Ba Suhay and Shinqltl the IdrlsI. Ibn Sa‘ud’s
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111