Page 108 - Arabian Studies (II)
P. 108

98                                               Arabian Studies II

                          other claims. Ba Suhay also had his word to say: lie argued that
                          Sayyid Hasan had had no authority from the tribes to negotiate any
                          agreement and hence the agreement in dispute was only a private one
                          between individuals. The document, continued Ba Suhay, referred to
                          the IdrlsT Government which had never given its consent, 1 16 On
                          another occasion, Ba Suhay claimed that Sayyid Mustafa had misled
                          Sayyid Hasan on the terms they had negotiated.  1 1 7  Sayyid Hasan
                          similarly argued that his people were dissatisfied with the agreement
                          and would refuse to acknowledge its validity since he had signed it
                          ‘blindly’, relying on promises made to him by Sayyid Mustafa that
                          over and above the agreement, the Company was going to supply him
                          with rifles, ammunition and a 25 per cent royalty.  1 1 8
                            Wolfson denied that either Cooper or Holmes had made any verbaj
                          promises over and above the written agreement. Sayyid Mustafa
                          issued a similar denial from Cairo.119 He wrote that Sayyid Hasan
                          ‘could not but spread a rumour among the tribes to the effect that
                          the terms that had been signed by Sayyid Hasan in favour of
                          Craufurd were more in the interest of and better for the country
                          than the terms given by the Shell Company with whom I agreed to
                          work. His intention was to deceive the country and thus raise them
                          to prevent the Company from working. But I had sent to all the
                          chiefs of tribes a copy of the terms I had obtained from the Shell
                          Company. I also sent a copy of a letter Sayyid Hasan had sent me in
                          which he acknowledged that he and Sayyid Ahmad al-Sharlf
                          al-SanusT had seen the draft of the terms I had made with the
                          Anglo-Saxon Oil Co., and that they agreed to them because they
                          were better than the terms of Mr Craufurd which he had cancelled.
                          .. . When the tribes knew the facts of the case and the intentions of
                          Sayyid Hasan and his dealings with the Italians they became
                          apprehensive and showed him disobedience especially as Sayyid
  i                       Hasan did not give them any of the money he had received from the
                          Anglo-Saxon Oil Co.. . .’l 2 0
                            The Company refused not only to alter the terms of the agreement
                          but also to supply rifles, ammunition and loans to increase the
                          royalty.121 The Colonial Office joined in the debate and instructed
                          Aden to inform Sayyid Hasan that in the opinion of the British
                          government his demands were ‘unjustified’.12 2  Various ‘Asms,
                          unconnected with the Idris! Government, intimated to Wolfson that
                          Sayyid Hasan was attempting to make some gains for himself, his
                          family and Ba Suhay. A gift of £1000 would, it was suggested, bring
                          an end to the difficulties between the IdrlsT and the Company. I bn
                         Sa‘ud’s delegate let it be known that the cancellation of the
                          concession would incur ibn Sa‘ud’s ‘extreme displeasure’.  1 2 3
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113