Page 69 - DILMUN 14
P. 69

sabre') between the two types ofmortar is still visible where thc ccntral ١ower uscd

to be bound to the islamic cnceinte. Four samplcs have bccn aalyscd giving thie
following results‫ ﺩ‬:

Wter soluble salts      N. W.    S.w.    Ccntral   s.E.
Silica sand            Bastion  Bastion  'owcr
Carbonate sand + lime                             Bastion
Gypsunm                   ٦.2      6.9      2.1
                         15.6     ١5.9     32.6      7.4
                         60.8     55.1     5.28     38.2
                         13.9     15.8              40.1
                                            .91     11.2

   Once again, clearly, we are dealing with a gypsumllime mix. In this case,
 however, microscopic examination has revealed the presence of gypsun fibers
 which indicates that Calcium sulphate re-crystalized in the mortar. his phe­
 nomenon would suggest that gypsum was not introduced in the mix as an inert
 charge, but as an active binder. Yet, a Calcium Sulphate content ranging from 9 to
.15 per cent is far too little for gypsum to be the only binder material: the utilisation
 of a predominant quantity of lime, therefore, has to be assumed. As a matter of
 fact, the lime proportion cannot be accurately estimated, the carbonate sand being
chemically identical to aged limel'; nevertheless, it seems highly probable that
gypsum and lime were intentionally mixed.

   As for the greyish colpur of this mortar, an ancient technique, widely spread in
the Middle East, may be explanatory: in his study on traditional crafts, Wulff
states that "a specially water-proofed mortar is prepared by mixing sand, lime, and
wood ashes?5, his can be easily achieved if the lumps of quick lime are extracted
from the kiln with the remaining coals and ashes and subsequently soaked together
inwater. he presence of large carbon fragments in the samples examined accounts
for this hypothesis.

A‫ﻡ‬AD FOR
   he masons who, in the ifrst half of XVII century, mied the mortars for the

building of Arad fort were apparently less meticulous than their earlier colleagues:
 in the eight samples analysed, in fact, the gypsum content varies from 7% to
47%٦.

   Most probably, the gypsiferous soils that provided the raw material were very
impure and the mineral, not homogeneously fired, yielded an imprecise mixture of
gypsum, lime and even a sort of cement if significant clay was presentl٩, his mix

                                                       54
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74