Page 134 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol IV_Neat
P. 134

0
                 carrying the British, Persian, or Bahrein Hag in
                 Bahrein territorial waters, as well as Bahrein
                 vessels in Indian or Persian waters, and to
                 confiscate all arms and ammunition (weapons of
                 war) intended for Indian or Persian ports, or for
                 the Islands of Bahrein.
                   Tho effect of the prohibition at Bahrein was at
                 once perceptible in the customs returns, the total
                 valuo of the imports of arms and ammunition,
                 which had amounted to 80,819/. in 1897, falling to
                 313/. in the following year. In October 1905 the
                 Sheikh of Bahroin addressed a Memorial to the
                 Government of India, in which, among other
                 alleged grievances, he complained of the fact that
                 ho was obliged to interdict the sale of arms,and was
                 thereby deprived of an advantage enjoyed by all
                 the Arab Chiefs along tho Arabian coast, lie was Government of
                 informed in reply, in May 190G, that the rcstric-
                 tion on the importation of arms at Bahrein had
                 first been imposed in 1895 by himself on his own
                 initiative, and his attention was drawn to tho
                 measures ho had himself spontaneously taken
                 Irora time to time to stop the traffic. It was also
                 pointed out to him that tho Sheikh of Koweit
                 and tho Sheikhs of tho Trucial Coast had simi­
                 larly prohibited the traffic of arms in their terri­
                 tory, and he was given to understand that tho
                 Government of India wouId not consider for a
                 moment the possibility of cancelling or modi­
                 fying the Agreement he had concluded with the
                 British Government on this point.
                  There seems good reason to believe that a eon- Major Cox to
                 . i .1      .  *.i|. ..   * rr>      l Uovomment of
                 siderable amount of illicit arms traffic goes on at Dcccmber 2,
                 Bahrein. Writing in December 190G, Major   1906.
                 Cox furnished evidence that the port w'as rapidly
                 rising to importance as a centre of the trade.
                 The business in arms there, hitherto confined to
                 one dealer, had been taken over by a Company,
                 two of the shareholders being friends of Sheikh
                 Esa and opponents of customs reform, lie added
                 that, the business had been largely extended, and
                 Bahrein was being used as a distribution centre
                 for supplying Persia.

                  3. Koweit.—On tho 24th May, 1900, tho Sheikh  Government of
                               _ .            ...... India’* letter of
                 of Koweit entered into an agreement with the July 5,1900.
                 British Government, by which he engaged *• abso­
                 lutely to prohibit the importation of arms into
                 Koweit or exportation therefrom.” To carry out
                 this engagement he issued on the same day (1)
                 a Notification declaring that “the importation
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139