Page 14 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol IV_Neat
P. 14

w




                                     10

                      In tho ports and territory of Musc.it itself this
                    predominance has been accentuated by the facts
                    that the trade of tho British dominions with
                    Muscat amounts to about live-sixths of the entire
                    trade of the country; that the latter is almost
                    exclusively in tho hands of Indian traders, who
                    aro British subjects; that the commerce and
                    interests of any other country aro relatively
                    insignificant; that the share of the trade enjoyed
                    by the three other PoweYs with whom Muscat
                    has direct Treaty relations, viz., America, Prance,
                    and Holland,* amounts, if added together, to less
                    than ouc-scvcntecnth of tho entire trade of the
                    country.
                     The relations of amity which have been above
                    recorded culminated in 1891 in an Agreement
                    voluntarily entered into by Sevyid Foysal-bin-
                    Turki, G.C.I.E., tho present Sultan, following
                    immediately upon tho conclusion of a new
                    Commercial Treaty between Great Britain and
                    Muscat, by which ho undertook never to cede,
                    to sell, to mortgage, or otherwise give for occu­
                    pation, save to tho British Government, tho
                    dominions of Muscat and Oman or any of their
                    dependencies.
                     In 1891 a French Vice-Consul was appointed
                    at Muscat, and this official made it his first aim
                    to alienate the sympathy of the Sultan from
                    Great Britain. The action of France was believed
                    to be inspired to a large extent by Russia, who
                    was credited with designs of an aggressive naval
                    policy in the Gulf. It would be tedious to retail
                    the circumstances under which this action was
                    exerted. Suffice it to say that matters reached a
                    crisis in 1899, when it transpired that an Agree­
                    ment had been concluded with the French
                    Government, in Maroh of the preceding year, for
                    tho lease of a coaling station at Bunder Gissch,a
                    place 5 miles south-east of Muscat.
                      This action was held to constitute a violation
                    of the Agreement of 1891 with Great Britain.
                      Owing to this and the breach of other Treaty
                    stipulations, and of personal assurances formally
                    entered into by the Sultan, a Memorandum was
                    presented to him on the 3rd February, 1899,
                    by tho Government of India, which, after re-
                     • Tho dutes of the respective Treaties are: United States
                    of America, 1833; Franco, 1841; Netherlands, 1877.
                     An Arrangement respecting trade juiisdictioa, wrecks, &c.,
                    was concluded by tho Portuguese Governor-General of
                    Mozambique in February 1826.
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19