Page 16 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol IV_Neat
P. 16

12
                  roquircd to dismiss a particular advisor must depend on
                  the speoial circumstances of the coho, it is hardly com­
                  patible with the independence of Muscat that the Sultan
                  should bo compelled to accept Ministers and advisers
                  who aro acceptable to the Brit'sh Government.
                        "(Signed)  RICHARD E. WEBSTER.
                                   ROBERT B. FINLAY.
                    “ La\o Ojjiceri Dejmrlment,
                       March 8, 181)9.”
                    With regard t.o the French coaling station at
                  Bunder Gissch, Her Majesty’s Government ex­
                  pressed both to Ilis Highness the Sultan and to
                  France the view that the sale or lease of any
                  part of His Highness’ dominions to a foreign
                  Power was not only a breach of the Sultan’s
                  Agreement with Great Britain of 1891, but was
                  also inconsistent with the Declaration concluded
                  between the British and French Governments in
                  1SC2. The Government of the French Republic i"»U Uriti.-h
                  accepted the British reading of the latter in-
                  strument, viz., that neither State might accept Arbitration,
                  any cession or lease of Muscat territory; and
                  it was agreed that France should be free
                  to establish a coal depAt on tho same terms
                  as those granted to Great Britain, viz., on
                  sutTerancc, and such a depot lias been established
                  iu Muscat Harbour on a portion of the ground
                  originally allotted to Great Britain for the
                  purpose. The result, therefore, of British action
                  was to prevent a lease or cession of territory to
                  France in contravention of the Declaration of
                  I86‘i, which would otherwise have Liken pheo.
                  Tn other words, the British protest, so fur from
                  being a breach of that Declaration as argued
                  by the French Government, prevented its breach
                  by France.


                       Grant of French flays to Muscat Dhows.
                    France lias always refused to permit the exer­
                  cise by the war-ships of any other Power of the
                  droit de visile on tho. high seas ns regards ships
                  carrying the French flag, and, by only partially
                  ratifying the Brussels General Act in 3S92, she
                  preserved this claim to resist the right of search.
                    The French officials in Obokh, Madagascar,
                  and the Comoros have granted, from time to
                  time, French ships’ papers and flags to subjects
                  of the Sultan of Muscat, and the same course
                  has been taken by the French Consuls at Aden,
                  Muscat, and Zanzibar. Most of the Omanis who
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21