Page 86 - The Persian Gulf Historical Summaries (1907-1953) Vol IV_Neat
P. 86
80
ftiul not to cede, soil, mortgago, or otherwise give
occupation of any portion of their territories,
save to the British Government. In rcspoct of
El Katr, wo havo at present no formal Conven
tions. Wo have declined, however, to recognize
Turkish pretensions on the peninsula, and the
leading Chief has on more than one occasion
approached our officers in the Gulf with a
request that he may bo admitted to closer
relations with the Indian Government. Bahrein
has for long boon, to all intents and purposes, a
British Protectorate; while, in the caso of
Koweit, though tho Turks havo laid claim to
certain ill-defined rights of sovereignty, we havo
always assorted that tho Sheikh enjoys a large
measure of practical independence, and His
Majesty’s Government havo promised him their
good offices. Tho maintenance of the maritime
peace in the Gulf is an object which, for moro
than a century past, we have steadily kept in
view in all our dealings with the Arab tribes.
To seeuro this object we havo prohibited tho uso
of armed boats by tho Chiefs, and havo taken
upon ourselves the duty of policing all these
waters. A necessary corollary of this policy is
that the Chiefs cannot themselves adopt forcible
measures for the preservation of their monopoly
in connection with the pearl fisheries. It is
clear, therefore, that wo on our part owe to them
an obligation to defend their rights so far as they
can reasonably be substantiated. This duty
carries with it incidentally the advantage that, if
our right to police the pearl banks is recognized,
a large area of the Gulf becomes at once
practically British waters.
“ In the past we have on more than ono
occasion intervened to prevent the intrusion of
foreigners. In 18G3 a British steamer appeared
in the Gulf with trained divers and scientific
appliances, but the steps which were at once
taken by the Resident, with tho approval of the
Bombay Government, sufficed to frustrate the
attempted encroachment. In 1874, and again in
1890, Her Majesty’s Government, on the advice
of the Government of India, declined to coun
tenance proposals made by British Companies to
exploit the fisheries. In 1894 support was
refused to an application by a British subject to
the Persian Government for pearling Concessions
in the Gulf. In 1899, in connection with the
llegcd grant of certain privileges to two Euro-
a
pea ns by the Persian Government, the Mushir-