Page 69 - Life & Land Use on the Bahrain Islands (Curtis E Larsen)
P. 69

final!
                                           -45-




               Prideaux (1908-9) noted this difference and stated that these wind-swept
       tombs at the higher elevations had been eroded by greater exposure to the wind.
       This theory was tested in the field by making traverses through tumuli fields along
       convenient wadis. Had there been surface erosion of tombs by wind as a function
       of elevation, one would anticipate a gradational relationship in the degree of
       erosion observed. Thus, tombs at the highest elevations would be expected to be
       severely eroded while those at lower elevations would be less affected by wind.
       This gradational relationship was not present. Barbar period tomb clusters abruptly
       bordered the lower limit of the shallower tomb groups. There was no difference in
       tomb height as a function of elevation, and thus wind erosion was not a factor in
       their shape. With this in mind, estimates of tomb number for the Barbar period can
       be narrowed by relative dating of the dense clusters of mounded tombs. Shallow
       tombs at higher elevations have been recently excavated by Aziz Ali Ibrahim of the
       Bahrain Department of Antiquities as well as Habgood (1982). Pottery from these
       tombs is identical with material illustrated in Figure 43h and Figure 47s in
       Appendix I pointing to Pre Barbar and Barbar I use.
                A mean density of the remaining Barbar tombs was determined by finding
       the area and number of tombs per hectare from each of the discrete clusters. The
       mean density was found to be 53 tombs per hectare. The combined area of the
       clusters was calculated to be of 3247 hectares. TTiis gave an estimate of 172,093
       individual tombs, well above Bibby*s estimate. This number provides a basis for
       approximating the Barbar period population.
               Recent detailed physical anthropological work by Frtfhlich (1982, 1983)
       shows there was no sexual segregation in the use of these tombs. Both male and
       female skeletal remains were present. Infant burials, too, were represented, but as
       subsidiary interments (Fr#ich 1983). Notwithstanding IbrahimTs reports of multiple
       or subsidiary burials present in the dense Barbar tomb clusters, it is clear that the
       majority of tombs are primary, individual burials. This is borne out in discussion
       with Frtfilich, who performed the skeletal recoveries. Of a total of 60 surface
       tombs excavated by Ibrahim and his team, 47 (78%) were found to be individual
       interments. Thus, even though the data base is not complete, it is initially helpful
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74