Page 28 - Hikayat-Patani-The-Story-Of-Patani 1
P. 28

A SHORT HISTORY OF PATANI          19

         he spent a few years, returning to Johore in 1641.97 Three years later,
         the queen of Patani, Raja Kuning, was said to have been married to
         a younger brother of the Sultan of Johore.98 Before another year passed,
         however, this prince was forced to flee from Patani, while his mother
         and followers were massacred.99 The HP explains the incident in terms
         of another adulterous affair, this time between the Queen’s husband and
         a court singer, Dang Sirat.100 Whatever the cause, the conflict was
         sufficiently serious to cause the Dutch Governor of Malacca, Jeremias
         Van Vliet, to warn the Dutch Company of an impending war.101 Later
         that year, in October 1644, the Company learned that a Patani envoy
         had been sent to Johore to settle the differences between the two states,
         and he was successful.102
           What happened to Patani over the remainder of the century is quite
         unclear. There are numerous references in Dutch and English sources
         to a queen still reigning in Patani in the years between 1671 103 and 1686
         or 1688,104 105 but no definite information for the interval between 1645
         and 1671. What seems consistent in the sources are references to conflict
         between Patani and Songkhla. In 1671,
           The wars between the Queen of Patani and the King of Singora
         continue still, notwithstanding this King [of Siam] hath sent his ambassa­
         dors to both to mediate between them.100

           It was the same conflict which still continued in 1678—79; Siam
         assisting Ligor and Patani against the “King of Songkhla” who could
         not be dislodged, and who gained from gun-running by English adven­
         turers.106 Finally, probably in 1680, Songkhla seems to have been
         defeated;107 for the French travellers visiting Siam between 1684 and
         1689 made no mention of any such conflict continuing, though they do
         mention the queen of Patani108 and they looked favourably on the
         prospect of accepting the cession of Songkhla to France.109 It is highly

         87 DR, 21 November 1640, pp. 85—86.
         88 Winstedt, 1962, p. 139.
         88 DR, 1644—45,6 June, p. 86.
         100 HP text, pp. 59—65.
         101 DR, 1644—45,6 June, p. 86.
         182 Ibid., p. 92.
         103 RR, II, 101.
         101 Gervaise, 1690, pp. 316—17.
         105 RR, II, 101.
         100 RR, II, 167,177—81,184,189—90,200—1,214—15, 220—21,237—39,267.
         107 RR, II, 267; of. Gervaise, 1690, p. 61.
         108 Gervaise, 1690, pp. 316—17.
         108 Cf. Hutchinson, 1968, pp. 36—38.
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33