Page 25 - Hikayat-Patani-The-Story-Of-Patani 1
P. 25

16                   HIKAYAT PATANI

                       received in marriage the queen’s niece, apparently Raja Kuning,
                       daughter of Raja Ungu by the Sultan of Pahang,67


                                         RAJA UNGU AND SIAM
                        For reasons unexplained, but which must be related to the collapse
                       of Johore at the hands of Acheh in 1615,68 as well as to great internal
                       disturbances in Ayudhya in the later years of King Song Tham’s reign
                       and after his death in 1628,69 Patani adopted an anti-Siamese policy
                       under Raja Ungu, who succeeded to the throne around 1624.70 The
                       HP specifically states that she refused to allow herself to be called by
                       the Thai title Phrao-cao,"1- and goes on to say that she arranged for the
                       marriage of her daughter, Raja Kuning, to the Sultan of Johore, not­
                       withstanding her earlier marriage to Qkphaya Deca, who would appear
                       to have still been alive.72 There followed warfare between the two states,
                       explained in Thai and European accounts as rebellion against the crown
                       and in the HP as a Siamese attack.
                        King Song Tham of Ayudhya died in December 1628, and there
                       ensued a long period of internal political crisis which persisted up to the
                       accession of King Prasat Thqng in 1630. At that time, Patani already
                       was in rebellion, and Nakhqn Si Thammarat “was threatened with a
                       serious war by the people of Patania.” 73 The events which followed
                       are described by Jeremias van Vliet, who arrived in Ayudhya in 1633
                       and wrote his account in 1636 and 1640.74 Noting that Patani long had
                       sent tribute to the kings of Siam, Van Vliet explained that the rebellion
                       arose
                        by the ambition of the late princess [= ruler, Raja Ungu] to obtain
                       the highest power and by the great authority of some mandarins especial­
                       ly Dato Bestaar (who were not loved by most of the Orangh Cayos)... 75

                        And so, cloaking their rebellion in terms of legitimacy,
                        ...the ambitious princes and mandarins... made known in public that


                       67 HP text, p. 51.
                       08 Winstedt, 1932, p. 35.
                       60 Wood, 1959, pp. 168—76.
                       70 Wyatt, 1967, p. 30, n. 57; and see below, Chapter VI, section 16—20.
                       71 HP text, p. 51.
                       72 HP text, pp. 51—54.
                       73 Van Vliet, 1938, p. 131.
                       74 Van Vliet, 1958, p. vii.
                       75 Van Vliet, 1910, p. 37.
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30