Page 24 - Hikayat-Patani-The-Story-Of-Patani 1
P. 24

A SHORT HISTORY OF PATANI           15

         of Patani and divide the realm of Patani between them.61 A somewhat
         different version of the story was given in a written version sent through
         Admiral Verhoeven the same year to Holland, according to which the
         late sultan of Johore (cAli Jalla cAbdul-Jalil Syah, 1580—97) had
         married his second son to the daughter of the king of Patani at the
         latter’s request; and the prince’s youngest brother had accompanied him
         to live in Patani. The youngest brother misconducted himself with the
         wife of his elder brother, and the offended husband had both his younger
         brother and his wife killed for their adultery. Thereupon, “the king of
         Patani” in his turn had the elder brother killed.62 Whatever the details
         — and the accounts are obscure, when not downright contradictory —
         the significance of this European evidence is to depict a relationship
         which was close, and in which Johore and Pahang appear to have been
         at some disadvantage, for Johore repeatedly was seeking Dutch aid
         against Patani, while Patani appears to have needed none. In addition,
         Patani was sufficiently powerful to be able to blockade the trade of
         Pahang in 1613, forcing Sultan cAbdul-Ghafur to visit Patani with his
         wife, Raja Ungu of Patani;63 and when he died the following year,
         Raja Ungu returned to live in Patani. In addition, by the time of Floris’s
         visit to Patani in 1612—13, the daughter of the third of Patani’s royal
         sisters was married to another prince of Johore, the Raja of Siak.64
         Despite, or perhaps because of, such close connections, Patani’s relations
         with Johore were far from peaceful, and they certainly were intensive
         over a period extending from the turn of the century to the 1640’s and
         beyond.
           By the reign of Raja Biru (1616—23), Patani’s position seems to have
         come to a delicate balance between Thai and Johore influence. Raja
         Biru appears to have been more friendly with the Thai than her pre­
         decessor had been. (Alternatively, it is possible and even likely that Siam
         again was becoming more active on the Malay Peninsula than it had
         been during the period of warfare and instability that had preceded the
         reign of King Song Tham (1610—28).) The HP tells us that the “junior
         aide-de-camp (bentara kiri)” was given the Thai title khun (a rank of
         nobility) ;65 and a Thai officer, Qkphaya Deca, who may have been the
         eldest son of the ruler of Nakhqn Si Thammarat,66 asked for and
          01 Begin ende Voortgangh, Verhoeven, pp. 43—44.
          62 Begin ende Voortgangh, Verhoeven, pp. 205—6.
          03 Moreland, 1934, pp. 72—73.
          04 Moreland, 1934, p. 63.
          05 HP text, p. 50.
          00 Terpstra, 1938, p. 105. Cf. Wyatt, 1967, p. 30, n. 61.
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29