Page 18 - Common Civil Code (Marathi)

g‘mZ ZmJar H$m¶Xm ‘m¡bmZm dhrXþÔrZ ImZ
EH$mË‘Vm Am{U gwYmaUm VH©$g§JV Zmhr. amï´>mÀ¶m KQ>ZoVrb

amÁ¶ñVar¶ ¶mXrV 66 Zm|Xr AmhoV Am{U amÁ¶m§Zm doJdoJio H$m¶Xo
H$aʶmg§~§Yr {Xboë¶m A{YH$mamÀ¶m ¶mXrV 47 Zm|Xr AmhoV. ˶m‘ܶo gmå¶
AgUo JaOoMo Zmhr. amÁ¶mÀ¶m ^m¡Jm¡{bH$ Am{U gm§ñH¥${VH$ {d{dYVoda
AmYm[aV {^Þ H$m¶Xo ¶mnmgyZ XoemÀ¶m EH$mË‘Vog H$moUVmhr YmoH$m Zmhr.

H$moUVmhr g‘yh Y‘m©À¶m ZmdmImbr ñdV:gmR>r doJù¶m ApñVËdmMr
‘mJUr H$ê$ eH$V Zmhr. Agm ݶm¶mYre Hw$bXrn qgJ ¶m§Mm Xmdm Amho.
VWmnr Amåhr ^mfoÀ¶m Zmdm§Imbr doJù¶m ApñVËdmMr ‘mJUr Ho$br Zmhr
H$m? Am{U ^mfoda AmYm[aV XoemMr aMZm Zì¶mZo H$aʶmV Ambobr Zmhr

H$m? ˶mZwgmaM ^mfoda AmYm[aV amÁ¶m§Zm ‘mݶVm {Xbobr Amho.
¶m nmœ©^y‘rda AmXaUr¶ ݶm¶mYre Ho$di Ym{‘©H$ g‘yhmbm
doJir AmoiI Xoʶmg§~§Yr ˶m§Mm Xmdm ’o$Q>miV AmhoV. hr ~m~ VH©$g§JV
Zmhr. gm‘m{OH$ Am{U amOH$s¶ Ñï>rH$moZm§VyZ ‘mݶVmàmá h¸$m§À¶m {déÕ

Amho. H$m¶ hr AmoiI Ho$di EH$m ݶm¶mYrem§À¶m CX²KmofUo‘wio g§nwï>mV
¶oB©b? (B§{S>¶Z E³gàog 6 Owb¡, 1995)
There is absolutely no logical connection between

uniformity and reform. The case against the former is as
unassailable as it is for the latter. Nor is uniform law imperative,
as the judges argue, for the promotion of national unity and
solidarity. There are a number of 66 entries in the State List and

47 in the Concurrent List of the Constitution on which States are
empowered to make laws without any obligation to conform to
uniformity. If diversity of laws, based on geographical and
cultural diversities of the States, has not threatened the unity of

the country, would it be threatened only if the diversities are of
non-territorial form as are religious communities?
Justice Kuldip Singh has proclaimed that no community
could claim to remain a separate entity on the basis of religion.

14