Page 115 - North Atlantic and Nordic Defense
P. 115

North European and North Atlantic Defense: The Challenges Return

            Colonel Boyd had a real issue with the aviation design teams that in addition to the F-4, gave the USAF its
            famous Century Series, the F-101, F-102, F-104, F105, and F-106.


            The comment was often made in those days by USAF Fighter Pilots, “Why are we flying Navy aircraft?”

            In addition to the F-4, the USAF also had the Navy developed A-7.

            John Boyd brilliantly challenged all designers too essentially replicate his great success in flying the F-86.


            He made a very cogent case in claiming that modern fighters needed a “bubble” canopy and the best
            relative “energy maneuverability” possible as more powerful engines were being developed.

            Boyd stressed P sub s diagrams.


            Ps simply allows comparisons of aircraft at different altitudes to essentially see where the different “edges of
            the envelope” advantages existed.


            With that knowledge and practice and being competently flown, a fighter pilot would have a significant
            advantage in engaging.


            Understanding relative platform energy maneuverability, especially in F-15, F-16 and F/A -18 improvements
            in airframe/wing design and engine performance, would give a fighter pilot a significant advantage in a 1 V
            1 “Knife fight ” up to to “fur ball,” which is colloquial term for a swirling engagement with many bogies and
            friendlies.


            Using P sub s charts the pilot would know where to optimize the fight to gain an advantage.

            To Boyd, visual lookout was essential and he was totally correct.

            Finally, Section (USN/USMC ) or two ship USAF and Division (USN/USMC) or four ship (USAF terminology)
            pairing tactics become a huge consideration.

            Boyd again got it correct -- a “Bubble” canopy would make a huge difference in keeping mutual support and
            look-out doctrine in any air-to-air engagement.

            Essentially his OODA (Observe, Orient, Decide and Act) began with looking out see the enemy, orient the
            fighter, decide if an advantage exists, OR not, and then act employing knowledge of the human/machine
            capability.

            The remarkable combat success of the F-15 Eagle Fighter Pilots of over 100 to zero kill ratio owes a debt of
            gratitude to the late Col John Boyd USAF (ret).

            The Mobilization/Modernization Dynamic


            In the design era of Boyd’s OODA formulation another technological imperative was just beginning to be seen
            -- advanced weapon designs.

            Perhaps the best combat example is the successful laser-guided bomb attack on the Paul Doumer Bridge in
            the later days of the Vietnam War.



            Page 114
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120