Page 100 - ASBIRES-2017_Preceedings
P. 100

Samarakkody & Dharmawansa



       become  a  significant  factor.  According  to    6.2  Future Direction
       expert survey and data analysis findings it is    •  Can  be  developed  the  research  by
       necessary  to  execute  well  organized  and         considering  all  the  manufacturing  plants
       planed procedure for training programs. It is        of the company.
       better to follow Plan-Do-Check-Act method         •  This was an application of SEM so able
       to move towards continuous improvement of            to develop this by using mediators.
       self-checking  method.  The  impact  of           •  This can be expanded as determining the
       Motivational programs mentioned here was             influence  of  self-checking  method  on
       evaluated  by  comparing  with  existing             business performance.
       programs with in the plant and followed by
       the  other  departments.  Therefore  quality                    REFERENCES
       assurance  department  can  bench  mark
       corresponding  strategies  and  are  able  to        Faizur, M., Mohan, L., Rahaman, Baral,
       adjust   and   modify    those   strategies.          Mannan, M.A., Nabi, A., & Chowdury.
       Innovative  motivation  programs  are  also           (2010). Quality Management in Garment
       required  to  employee  moral  up.  Expert’s          Industry of Bangladesh. 8.
       survey  highlight  the  necessity  to  improve       Islam, M. M., Khan, A. D., & Khan, M.
       rewarding system because it is able to act as         M. (2012). Minimization of Reworks in
       supportive  roles  for  the  other  significant       Quality  and  Productivity  Improvement
       factors related strategies.                           in  the  Apparel  Industry.  International
                                                             Journal  of  Engineering  and  Applied
       6.1 Limitation                                        Sciences, 18.
       •  Lack of literature resource to develop the        Juran,  J.M.  (1994).  Taylor  sstem  and
         research procedure.                                 quality control. 22.
       •  Only 50% of population have selected for          Juran,  J.M.,  &  Godprey,  A.B.  (1999).
         the sample.                                         Juran's Quality Hand Book (5th edition).
       •  Respondents may have read the questions            New York: McGraw-Hill
         differently  so  that  the  answers  were          Pekar,  J.M  (1995).  Quality  assurance
         collected  as  per  their  own  interpretation      mannual.  In  J.P.  Pekar  (Ed.),  Total
         about the question.                                 quality Management (pp. 6). Philadelpia:
                                                             ASTM.



































                                                       90
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105