Page 24 - SuDS Design & Evaluation Guide-Newham V2 Pages_Neat
P. 24
Overview 5.3 The objectives of the 5.4 SuDS design is considered
evaluation process
at the beginning
Throughout the various design stages the
In the past, drainage was usually considered
at the end of the design process, with a
emerging designs should be evaluated
against core design criteria relating to the
site layout. In many respects the pipe
four main objectives of SuDS design: piped drainage solution superimposed onto a
quantity, quality, amenity and biodiversity. infrastructure was independent of the
topography, geology and other hydraulic and
The objectives of the evaluation process are
environmental characteristics of the site.
to ensure that SuDS:
Sustainable drainage, however, must be
■ meet mandatory (NSTS) and LPA
requirements for water quantity and integrated into the site design. It should
reflect the topography, geology and drainage
quality, amenity and biodiversity
characteristics of the site together with the
■ maximise opportunities for multi- character of the landscape and have due
functionality and amenity uses consideration of any impact on heritage
■ enhance biodiversity throughout the assets.
development SuDS Concept Design ensures that SuDS can
■ take opportunities to conserve and influence the layout of the development and
enhance heritage assets and the historic is a key part of pre-application discussions.
environment
19
■ integrate into the development’s layout
and design
■ are appropriate, cost-effective and robust A wetland at Fort Royal Primary School,
Worcestershire, enhances biodiversity within
■ are practical to maintain in the long term. the school grounds.
London Borough of Newham SuDS D & E Guide © 2020 McCloy Consulting & Robert Bray Associates
