Page 40 - January 2019 | Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal
P. 40

ETHICS PErSPECTIvE
             Second, and more challenging, is if a client   action to protect the client.” RPC 1.14(b)    Duty to communicate
           will not consent to or instructs their attorney   “When  taking  protective  action,  a  lawyer   Finally, when an attorney decides to make
           not to report abuse.  Under Rule 1.6(b)(1), an   is impliedly authorized under Rule 1.6(a)   a mandatory report about elder abuse
           attorney may reveal confidential information   to reveal [confidential] information but   without the consent of the client, the
           to prevent reasonably certain death or   only to the extent reasonably necessary to   duty of communication requires that the
           substantial bodily harm.  Depending on the   protect the client’s interests.”  RPC  1.14(c)    attorney must discuss the matter with the
           circumstances, an attorney has discretion to   Comment [5] to Rule 1.14 expressly   client and inform them about the report.
           determine whether the risk of harm created   includes “consulting with adult-protective   RPC 1.4 While Rule 1.4, Comment 6
           by suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation of   agencies” as a protective action.    provides that delaying transmission of
           the client justify reporting to APS even if the   Fourth, without client consent, without   information may be possible “if the client
           client refuses consent or instructs otherwise.  the  risk  of  death  or substantial  bodily   would be likely to react imprudently to
             Third and potentially relevant for an   harm and without  issues of diminished   an immediate communication,” this only
           abused elder, is  a situation in which a   capacity, if an attorney has reasonable   delays  the  necessary  conversation  with
           client  refuses  consent  but  their  capacity   cause  to  believe  a  client  is  being  abused,   the client.
           to make adequately considered decisions   neglected or exploited, ORC 5101.63 is a   In Cuyahoga County, the Adult Protective
           is diminished, whether because of mental   law that likely will require the disclosure   Services web portal for reporting elder
           impairment or for some other reason.  Rule   of client confidential information in   abuse is  https://dsas.cuyahogacounty.us/
           1.14 and its comments provide overarching   making a mandatory report.  Rule  1.6(b)  adultscreening/ and the 24-hour hotline is
           guidance that “the attorney shall, as far as   (6),  permits  an  attorney  to  disclose   (216) 420-6700.
           reasonably possible maintain a normal   confidential information “to comply
           client-attorney relationship.” RPC 1.14(a)    with other law or court order.”  The Ohio
           However, “when the attorney reasonably   Supreme Court, interpreting prior similar   Jean McQuillan is an Assistant Professor
           believes  that  the  client  has  diminished   Disciplinary Rules has held that disclosure   of Law at Case Western Reserve University
           capacity, is at risk of substantial physical,   of confidential information required by   teaching legal ethics after 21 years of private
           financial or other harm unless action is   other law does supersede the duty of   practice in Cleveland. She served on the Board
           taken and cannot adequately act in the   confidentiality.  Allen County Bar Ass’n v.   of Professional Conduct of the Supreme Court
           client’s own interest, the attorney may take   Williams, 95 Ohio St. 3d 160, at 162, 2002   of Ohio from 2000–2009. She has been a CMBA
           reasonably necessary protective action,   Ohio 2006, 766 N.E.2d 973, at 975 (Ohio   member since 1980 and can be reached at jean.
           including  consulting  with  individuals   2002)(discussing the “required by law”   mcquillan@case.edu or (216) 368-1673. Any
           or  entities  that  have  the  ability  to  take   exception under DR 4-101(C)(2))  opinions expressed herein are solely her own.





                      We salute those who remind us that age
                               holds no monopoly on wisdom.









                                     Klevis Bakiajevis Bakiaj
                                     Kl           M             Andrew Clevesndrew Cleves  Alan Dailide
                                                                               Alan Dailide
                                                                A
                                                  Megan Bennettegan Bennett


                                                         Angela Lydondon
                                                                       Christina Niroristina Niro
                                                                                    Michael Nunnari, Jr.ichael Nunnari, Jr.
                            J Joseph Guentheroseph Guenther  T Thomas Haren homas Haren   Angela Ly  Ch  M



                                                                 Ry
                       B B Bradley Reedradley Reedradley Reed  A Allison Taller llison Taller   Jonathan Sc  Ryan Smithan Smith  Mia Ulerya Ulery  Justin Younkerounker
                                                                                Mi
                                                 Jonathan Scandlingandling
                                                                                            Justin Y
                                       Reich
                FrantzWard.com




                                                                                                      11/19/18   6:25 PM
            FW072_YngLwyrs Ad_7.25x4.91_111518.indd   1
      40 |  Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Journal                                                    clemetrobar.org
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45