Page 175 - Art In The Age Of Exploration (Great Section on Chinese Art Ming Dynasty)
P. 175

ghalib  ila'lldh.  The lower one is broken  at the  moreover,  may suggest that the  sword was  57'
       sides in the usual way, ghd:lib, by medallions  designed not for a ruler but  possibly for presen-
       filled with  a palmette  or fleur-de-lis in opaque  tation to an emir, or even a neighboring  Christian  NASRID  SHIELD  (ADARGA)
       turquoise and black enamel on a translucent  green  prince.  However, if it was indeed made for  before  1492
       enamel  ground.  The down-turned  quillons are  Boabdil, the  style, in accordance with such  cere-  Granada
       spewed from  the  mouths  of dragons or  felines,  monial weapons, would have been becomingly  hide, silk  embroidery
       worked in relief and with  chasing.  Below their  conservative.              J.M.R.   9°  75 (35 /s  x  292/2]
                                                                                                     3
                                                                                                x
      jaws on each side are small tonguelike panels, now                                     references:  Boeheim 1888, 279; Boeheim 1890, 18};
       rather damaged, of opaque white and  translucent                                      Madrid  1898,161; Nickel  1958, 98; Buttin  1960,
       red enamel, possibly suggesting a forked  tongue.                                     407,  447; Bruhn de Hoffmeyer  1982, 279;
       The flattened obverse and reverse bear enameled                                       Encyclopedia of Islam 1986, "Lamt,"  651-652;  Feest
       medallions: on the  obverse is a shield of European                                   1990,  7
       type with a diagonal bar from left  to right bear-                                    Kunsthistorisches Museum,  Vienna,  Hofjagd-und
       ing wa  Id  ghd  in naskhi;  on the  reverse is a trans-                              Riistkammer
      verse bar with the usual continuation  ild'lldh  BM
      in Kufic.  The inscriptions are in opaque white
      enamel on a decayed black enamel ground;  the
      ground of the  bar is of scrolling arabesque in sil-
      ver, with traces of gilding filled with  translucent
      green enamel.  The rest of the  surface bears  fine
      filigree and granulated  ornament.
        The sheath  of the  scabbard is of wood covered
       with dark brown leather heavily sewn with  metal
       thread;  the obverse has longitudinal  naskhi
       inscription  cartouches with variants of the
       inscriptions on the hilt, and three transverse bars.
       The cartouches are separated by knotted, winglike
       split palmettes enclosing a quatrefoil, with con-
       fronted palmettes on a plain ground. The  reverse
       of the  sheath is stitched  down the center with
       rather more elaborate palmettes  and small knots
       at each end.
        The mounts are gold and silver-gilt, solid or
       cast. Worked in champleve relief, they carry
       rather perfunctory chasing with  considerable sur-
       face ornamentation  in granulation and filigree,
       the latter mostly  fine spiral scrolls.  The granula-
       tion on the central, upper, and hilt mounts  forms
       stylized  Kufic  Idm-alifs.  The enameled plaques, in
       the  form  of European shield blazons or  transverse
       bars, are cloisonne with cloisons of fine  foliate
       scrollwork showing traces of gilding.  On  the
       obverse mount  at the tip, which ends in a small
       flattened  knob, are three plaques and a transverse
       bar between two shields, the latter with a diagonal
       bar sloping from  left  to right bearing  naskhi
       inscriptions. The reverse bears similar inscription
       plaques.
        The  Schriftwappen  of the  Nasrid rulers of Gra-
       nada was well known to the  Spanish rulers of the
       Reconquest, and its appearance on the  sheath and
       the  enamel plaques is not therefore a guarantee of
       Nasrid workmanship or even of a Nasrid date.
       However, the break at ghd'.lib seems to have been
       standard Nasrid practice, so that it does not count
       against the  sword's alleged provenance.  Although
       the confused stitched inscription cartouche on the
       sheath certainly testifies to inept copying of an
       original, it could also have been the  work of a
       well-meaning but not particularly literate Grana-
       dan craftsman.  On internal  grounds  the sword
       appears to be late fifteenth-  or early  sixteenth-
       century.  The absence of an owner's inscription,


       174   CIRCA  1 492
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180