Page 135 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 135

Varieties of Posttribulationism
    his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his
    elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the
    other.”22
       While much more could be said about the various views
    of semiclassic posttribulation interpretation, their major
    problem is that they arc not agreed as to how far to interpret
    prophecy literally. Most of them do not use the literal method
    in passages where to do so would lead to the pretribulational
    rapture view. Posttribulationists, of course, are also largely
    amillcnnial and also reject a literal millennium. Further con­
    sideration will be given to these arguments as they are met in
    the exposition of various arguments and passages.
       The scmiclassic posttribulational interpretation is at its
    worst, however, in attempting to affirm any reasonable se­
    quence of events relating to the Second Coming. This common
    problem of posttribulationism surfaces in almost every one of
    the major views of posttribulationism. The fact is, there is no
    clear reference to the rapture of the church in any of the
    prophetic passages in Matthew 24, Jude, or Revelation 19 that
    specifically deal with the Second Coming. A further problem
    surfaces when the resurrection of Revelation 20:4 is spe­
    cifically limited to saints who have been martyred in the
    Tribulation as contrasted to the church and is placed in an
    order following the Second Coming instead of being a part
    of it.
       Another major problem left unresolved by semiclassic
    posttribulational interpretation is the question as to why there
    is a rapture at the Second Coming. Especially for post­
    tribulationists who are premillennial, the insertion of a rap­
    ture at the time of the Second Coming does not fit well with
    the events that follow, and the omission of any specific refer­
    ence to it in detailed passages dealing with the Second Advent
    constitute an impressive argument that posttribulationists
    have not answered. The exegetical problems that face semi­
    classic posttribulational interpretation along with other views
                         141
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140