Page 136 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 136

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition
                will be examined in connection with Scriptures  that deal with
                 the subject.
                      Futurist Posttribulational Interpretation
                    Although the concept of a future Tribulation is not pecu­
                 liar to the twentieth century, it is probably fair to say that it
                 was not until this century that it became a predominant view
                 of posttribulationism. In the early church fathers, as well as in
                 the Protestant Reformation, this view was not given serious
                 consideration.
                    Probably the leading contender for the futurist view in
                 the twentieth century is George E. Ladd, who published his
                 work The Blessed Hope in 1956. Ladd assumed premillen-
                 nialism in establishing a future period of seven years or at least
                 three and one-half years between the present and the second
                 coming of Christ. In doing this he attempted to follow a more
                 literal interpretation of prophecy, especially Revelation 8-18,
                 which is in harmony with premillennialism as a whole. His
                 view, of course, differs in a number of important aspects from
                 that held by the early Fathers and the reformed theology of the
                 Protestant Reformation. It is Ladd’s point of view that pre-
                 tribulationism depends on dispensationalism as popularized
                 in the Scofield Reference Bible, and in rejecting dispen­
                 sationalism he believes he has undermined the foundation of
                 the pretribulational interpretation.
                    Although Ladd’s presentation of a future period of tribu­
                 lation is in contrast to the normal view' of it in the history of
                 the church, he devoted a third of his book to the historical
                argument for posttribulationism. His major argument is to the
                point that pretribulationism was unknown until the rise of the
                 Plymouth Brethren movement in the early nineteenth century,
                that pretribulationism started as a departure from the faith
                rather than from sound biblical studies, and that accordingly
                it should be discarded as a recent invention. In presenting
                this, however, Ladd was covering up the fact that his own
                                    142
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141