Page 170 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 170

General Posttribulational Arguments
    Christ at all (1 Cor. 1:7-8) and this could be the Rapture. In
    other words, once again his argument depends on a hasty and
    unsupported generalization. Like all other common words, the
    context must determine what is meant by “the end,” and the
    verses cited present no difficulty at all for the prctribulationist.
                Doctrine of the Rapture
      Posttribulationists do not usually appeal to the doctrine
    of the Rapture itself for support of their position. Ladd, for
    instance, seemed to avoid any specific exegesis of the principal
    rapture passages (John 14:3; 1 Cor. 15:51-52; 1 Thess.
    4:13-18). The reason for this, of course, is that they contribute
    nothing to support posttribulationism. Reese, on the other c
    hand, while not appealing to these passages, cited several in- jf-C-1
    stances where he believed positive teaching ofScripture placesy1'
    the Rapture after the Tribulation.
       Posttribulationists, depending on their line of argument,
    frequently offer proof, as Reese did, that the Rapture occurs
    after the Tribulation by referring to such texts as Matthew
    24:31 and Matthew 24:40-41. Gundry joins Reese and others
    in arguing from this doctrinal basis. In view of later exegesis of
    these passages where these arguments will be considered, it
    may be stated here that the pretribulational interpretation is
    that none of these passages actually refer to the Rapture; and,
    therefore, they do not constitute proof that the Rapture is
    explicitly after the Tribulation. Instead, even posttribu­
    lationists like Ladd agree that there is no explicit statement of
    a posttribulational Rapture.
       Reese’s argument is as follows: “In His discourses the
    Lord shows us the Elect being won for Him through the
    world-wide preaching of the gospel (Matt. xxii. 14); shows the
    Elect in the very midst of the trial (xxiv. passim)', describes the
    trial itself; portrays the Elect as a poor widow, crying in her
    distress to the Righteous Judge to hasten His Coming, and
    remember her in her affliction; shows us that, when the very
                        177
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175