Page 195 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 195

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition
                  “the Lord’s own word” (1 Thess. 4:15). This is a problem for
                  the posttribulationists as they want the Rapture to be a phase
                  of the Second Coming and, accordingly, not a new doctrine.
                  Gundry went into a rather complicated explanation, claiming
                  that Paul received this truth from the oral tradition of Jesus'
                  teaching on the Mount of Olives in the Olivet Discourse. This
                  far-fetched point of view is contradicted by all the facts we
                  have, especially Galatians 1:15-19. where Paul claimed he did
                  not receive information from the apostles. If Galatians was
                  written after 1 Thessalonians, as most scholars believe, it
                  would rule out any claim for having transmitted information
                  on this point. The Gospel of John, of course, had not yet been
                  written. The purpose of Gundry's discussion is to deflate as
                   much as possible the concept dial the Rapture is a new doc­
                  trine, distinct from the Second Coming. From a pretribula-
                   tional point of view, it is most significant that Paul did not
                  quote any of the Old Testament passages on the second com­
                   ing of Christ, but rather he claimed that the Rapture was a
                   direct revelation. Gundry, here, was grasping at a straw. Even
                   Ladd, a fellow posttribulationist, had no difficulty accepting
                   the concept that this is a new doctrine. The entire problem
                  arises because Gundry is a posttribulationist.
                      According to 1 Thessalonians 4, at the time of the Rap­
                   ture, saints will rise from the earth and meet the Lord in the
                   air. As there is no other passage that clearly states the same
                   truth, this has become a focal point for discussion between
                   posttribulationists and pretribulationists. Pretribulationists
                   have a simple explanation, that it is an amplification of what
                  has been previously revealed in John 14:2-3 and that saints are
                  taken from the earth in the process of taking them to heaven to
                  the Father’s house.
                      Posttribulationists, however, have a problem of har­
                  monizing this with the passages relating to the second coming
                  of Christ. After all, if Christ is coming to the earth to set up
                  His kingdom, why do saints have to leave the earth to meet the

                                      204
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200