Page 199 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 199

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition
                 stances, how can the rapture of the church, whether presented
                 in the pretribulational or posttribulational point of view, be
                 “first” in the sense of being first in time? It is rather that the
                 term first is used in contrast to the final resurrection men­
                 tioned in Revelation 20, the resurrection of the wicked. The
                 resurrection of all the righteous is first, not in the sense of
                 number one, but in the sense of being before the final resurrec­
                  tion.
                     Accordingly, there is a scries of resurrections that the
                  Bible presents, namely. Christ’s first, then the resurrection of
                  Matthew 27, then the Rapture, and then the resurrection of
                  Old Testament saints and tribulation saints after the Tribula­
                  tion. This is not a contradiction as they all are first or before
                  the final resurrection. The argument is therefore without merit
                  as it is built on the wrong meaning of this word first.
                     The important point to note is that 1 Thessalonians 4
                  emphasizes the translation in relationship to the resurrection,
                  but it docs not introduce the resurrection itself as a new doc­
                  trine. The distinguishing characteristic of the Rapture, as op­
                  posed to other events where resurrection takes place, is that at
                  the Rapture there is a translation of living saints. As far as
                  Scripture is concerned, the Rapture is the only time when
                  living saints are translated at the same time a resurrection
                  takes place. None of the other events described as resurrec­
                  tions include this feature. Posttribulationists, accordingly, are
                  faced with a real problem in support of their doctrine to prove
                  that there is a translation in any of the series of events relating
                 to the second coming of Christ after the Tribulation.
                    Another important point is that there is no warning of the
                 Great Tribulation. While the second coming of Christ as pre­
                 sented in the Bible is clearly an event that follow's the Great
                 Tribulation and is so indicated in major passages such as
                 Matthew 24 and Revelation 4-18, by contrast, the rapture
                 passages have no such warning. In John 14 it is offered as an
                 imminent hope to the disciples; and in 1 Thessalonians 4, the
                                     208
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204