Page 203 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 203

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition
        to be considered. Thus the particle (de) is best taken, not as
        adversative, but transitional and may well be rendered
        ‘now.’”1 As Hiebert pointed out, the translation “but" is used
        by Conybeare, Darby, Goodspeed, Lattey, Phillips, Way,
        Weymouth, Williams, RSV. and 20th Cent., while both the
        New American Standard and the New International versions
        use “now.”
           It would only be natural for the Thessalonians, having
        been taught the truth of the Rapture and the wonderful fact
        that when it occurred they would see their loved ones who had
        died, for them to ask the question. When will the Rapture
        occur? The answer given in chapter 5 is that the time of the
        Rapture is uncertain. It would seem, if the posttribulational
        view were correct, that this would have been a good time for
        Paul to explain that, as a matter of fact, the Rapture could not
        occur soon and that at least a seven-year period would inter­
        vene. including the Great Tribulation, before they’ could ex­
        pect the fulfillment of the hope of the Lord’s return. Instead of
        that, he introduced the subject of the day of the Lord as hav­
        ing an uncertain beginning, and he seemed to tie the begin­
        ning of the day of the Lord with the time of the Rapture. The
        study of this chapter, while it was intended by’ Paul to have
        primarily a practical exhortation to the Thessalonians, is also
        related to the question of whether the Rapture is before or
        after the predicted Tribulation.
           The relationship of 1 Thessalonians 5 to the Rapture has
        been debated bv both pretribulationists and posttribu-
        lationists with an amazing variety’ of opinions.2 The prob­
        lem centers in the definition of “the day' of the Lord” and
        its relationship to the Rapture. Because there are differences of
        interpretation among both pretribulationists and posttribu-
        lationists, generalizations are inadvisable. The center of the
        problem is, first of all, the question of what “the day of the
        Lord” means. A second question is why the day of the Lord is
        introduced immediately after discussion of the Rapture. A
                           212
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208