Page 51 - The Rapture Question by John F. Walvoord
P. 51

The Rapture Question: Revised and Enlarged Edition
             ation of believers. As George E. Ladd stated, relative to the
             historical argument, “Let it be at once emphasized that we arc
              not turning to the church fathers to find authority for either
              pre- or posttribulationism. The one authority is the Word of
              God, and we are not confined in the strait jacket of tradi­
              tion.”10 The history of the doctrine of the church has always
              to this hour revealed progress in other areas, and it is to be
              expected that this will continue also in eschatology.
                 The doctrine of immincncy appears more clearly in the
              Protestant Reformation than it docs in the early church. It is
              perhaps significant that Robert H. Gundry, after devoting
              twelve pages to the refutation of immincncy in the early
              church, dismissed the contribution of the Protestant Reforma­
              tion to this doctrine in a few sentences.11 The facts are that
              both Calvin and Luther, as well as other prominent Re­
              formers, tended to identify the events of the Great Tribulation
              with their own contemporary history; and accordingly the
              concept of imminency became more prominent, even though
              the Reformers were amillennial and posttribulational.
              Through much of the history of the church, the apparent
              conflict between the concept of imminency and the necessity of
              intermediate events before the Second Advent continue to
              be a problem, with no complete solution until pretribula-
              tionism—placing the Rapture before end-time events—
              was advanced.
                       The Hermeneutical Argument
                 It is generally agreed by all parties that one of the major
              differences between amillennialism and premillennialism lies
              in the use of the literal method of interpretation. Amillenar-
              ians, while admitting the need for literal interpretation of
              Scripture in general, have held from Augustine to the present
              time that prophecy is a special case requiring spiritualizing or
              nonliteral interpretation. Premillenarians hold, on the con­
              trary, that the literal method applies to prophecy as well as

                                 54
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56