Page 12 - 2018 Racecar Engineering Engine Parts and Accessories Catalog
P. 12

REAR MAIN SEAL ADAPTERS







                Rear Main Seal Adapters
                Chevrolet Small Block Rear Main Seal Adapters
                Convert one-piece rear main seal on 1986 and newer small block Chevrolet to old style, two-
                piece rear seal to accept earlier (pre-1986) crankshaft. Billet aluminum adapters include hardware.
                Alignment tool allows quick, easy installation.
                  Part No.          Description
                  ALL26125    For Early (Pre-1986) Oil Pan
                  ALL26126     For Late (1987-Up) Oil Pan
                  ALL26127         Alignment Tool

                Chevrolet Small Block Rear Main Seal Adapters
                  Part No.                            Description
                 CAN21-850         Rear Main Seal Adapter, for Old Style (1986-Up) Oil Pan w/1-Pc. Seal
                Chevrolet Big Block Rear Main Seal Adapters
                Use an early style, Mark IV crank with two-piece rear main seal in the Mark V and VI blocks
                with one-piece rear seals. Late style oil pan must be used.
                  Part No.         Description
                  EAG500       Rear Main Seal Adapter
                Chevrolet Small Block Rear Main Seal Adapters
                Billet aluminum adapters convert 1986-up engines with one-piece rear main seal to use old style,
                two-piece seal and early crankshaft.
                  Part No.                            Description
                 MOR38315         Rear Main Seal Adapter, for New Style (1986-Up) Oil Pan w/1-Pc. Seal
                 MOR38415     Rear Main Seal Adapter, for Old Style (Pre-1980) Oil Pan w/Driver's Side Dipstick
                                                                                                       MOR38315
                TECH TIP

               Pushrods: Still Doing The Job After All These Years
                 Pushrod engines are often ridiculed by the "elite" automotive media, however, the fact remains that in high performance circles where conventional V-8's are
               the norm, the pushrod style engine is still king. The pushrod engine is physically smaller compared to its OHC counterpart because the camshaft and relatively
               simple cam drive are inside the block, making the engine narrower. The OHC Ford 4.6/5.0/5.4L modular engine, for example, is significantly wider and has a far
               more complex timing system compared to its predecessor, the Windsor small block.
                 Taking the brunt of the media's abuse is the pushrod itself, a length of metal tubing that transfers motion from the camshaft and lifter to activate the rocker
               arm. Pushrods have come under scrutiny since the introduction of the SpinTron, a machine that uses a powerful AC motor and a substitute crankshaft to spin the
               components of a test engine. The SpinTron's Laser Valve Tracking System (LVTS) camera records component motion. Data is imaged, graphed and examined so
               that engineers can identify problem areas and develop solutions. According to Chris Padgitt of Comp Cams, the SpinTron can also measure valve float, valve spring
               harmonics, pushrod deflection and "lofting", a condition where valves stay open at high RPM due to a loss of contact between the cam lobes and the lifters.
                 Prior to the SpinTron, engineers found that valvetrain vibration was caused by component flexing, much from the pushrods. Vibration increased with engine
               speed, creating damaging harmonics. Aggressive cam profiles, extreme valve spring pressures and large, heavy valves further aggravated matters and lofting
               caused the valves to remain open longer than they should.
                 Engineers quickly learned that these problems could be reduced or even eliminated by just using a more rigid pushrod. At one time, a 5/16" diameter x .080"
               wall pushrod was acceptable for many high performance applications, but that is no longer the case. Increasing pushrod rigidity merely involves larger diameter,
               thicker wall tubing. Of course, larger diameter pushrods increase mass and convincing engine builders to use a heavier pushrod hasn't been easy, particularly
               when lightweight valve train components are the vital to high RPM. However, builders have learned that the mass of the "pushrod side" components is not quite
               as critical compared to that of the "valve side" components.
                 In the past, valve train manufacturer's traditionally stocked only 5/16" and 3/8" diameter pushrods and larger, 7/16" diameter pushrods were only available by
               special order. Now Comp Cams, Crane Cams, Manley Performance and Trend Performance have begun stocking 7/16" diameter pushrods in both straight tube and
               dual taper designs. In pursuit of maximum performance at high RPM, NHRA Pro Stock competitors have begun using 1/2" or 9/16" diameter pushrods. When in
               question, it's always best to consult the manufacturer of the camshaft for the proper pushrods to use.
                 With diameter and wall thickness addressed, length is the next consideration. Naturally, the longer the pushrod is, the more susceptible it may be to flexing and
               vibration. "FE" Fords, B/RB Chryslers, 400-455 Olds and tall deck, big block Chevrolets all use pushrods well in excess of 9." All may be candidates for a pushrod
               upgrade if 5/16" pushrods are currently used in a high performance application. "The pushrod is still viewed as the weak link in the valve train", according to
               Padgitt. The ultimate pushrod would not only be very rigid, but lightweight as well. Some valve train manufacturer's are currently using Metal Matrix Composite
               (MMC). Similar to the material used in the manufacture of composite driveshafts, MMC has the strength equivalent of 4130 steel, yet is up to 60% lighter. Initial
               SpinTron testing of MMC pushrods has shown reduced flexing, valve float and valve bounce, but there is work still to be done.
                 The introduction of the GM Gen. III LS engine in 1997 and the subsequent release of the modern Chrysler Hemi in 2003 has demonstrated that the pushrod
               engine is here to stay. All of these signs ultimately point to the continued development and improvement of the pushrod engine.

                                 2018 ENGINE BUILDER CATALOG                                                   11
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17