Page 368 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 368

Magistrate  treats any document or object referred to as an exhibit in such a  statement, as an
               exhibit produced and identified in Court by the maker of the statement, the Magistrate shall be

               satisfied that the  document or object is sufficiently  described in the statement for  it to    be
                         79
               identified.








               (e) Rebuttal Evidence

               Rebuttal evidence is evidence that is produced  by  a party that tends to oppose or disprove

               evidence introduced by the other party. In general, the prosecution is expected to adduce all the
                                                                                                        80
               evidence on which it intends to rely before the close of the case for the prosecution R v Rice.

                                                                 81
               However, there are three exceptions to this practice:
                   a.  where any matter arises ex improviso which the prosecution could not foresee, evidence

                       may be given in reply to this new matter;
                   b.  where the evidence is a mere formality Khatibi v DPP ;
                                                                           82
                                                                                                       83
                   c.  in very exceptional cases in the light of the facts of the particular case: R v McKain.
               After any evidence is called by the defence the prosecution may introduce further evidence if it is

                                                                        84
               then admissible to rebut evidence adduced by the defence.  In deciding whether to exercise their
               discretion to permit the calling of evidence after the close of the prosecution case, the magistrates

               must look carefully at the interests of justice overall, and in particular the risk of any prejudice to

               the defendant.

               Anguilla





               79  Trinidad and Tobago – Summary Courts Act Chap. 4:20, section 63B(5)
               80  [1963] 1 All ER 832
                                                                        th
               81  Seetahal D, Commonwealth Caribbean Criminal Practice and Procedure, 4  ed. p 276
               82  (2004) 168 JP 36,
               83  (1994) 47 WIR 290
               84  Blackstone's Criminal Practice 2015, Section D22 Summary  Trial: The Course of the Trial, Defence Case  and Speeches -
               Evidence in Rebuttal
                                                                                                           29
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373