Page 373 - Magistrates Conference 2019 
        P. 373
     occasion, and, if he does not distinctly admit that he has made that statement, proof may be given
               that he did in fact make it. 102
               The same course may be taken with a witness upon his examination in chief, if the judge is of
               opinion that he is adverse to the party by whom he was called, or that his memory is in good
               faith at fault, and permits the question. 103
               A witness under cross-examination, or a witness whom the judge, under the provisions of the
               preceding section, has permitted to be examined by  the party who called him as to previous
               statements inconsistent with his present testimony, may be questioned as to previous statements
               made by him in writing, or reduced into writing, relative to the subject matter of the cause or
               matter, without the writing being shown to him or being proved in the first instance; but, if it
               intended to contradict him by the writing, his attention must, before contradictor proof can be
               given, be called to those parts of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of contradicting
               him. 104
               The judge may, at any time during the hearing or trail, require the document to be produced for
               his inspection and may thereupon make any use of it for the purposes of the hearing or trial he
               thinks fit. 105
               Jamaica
               In cases where the right of reply depends on the question whether evidence has been called for
               the defence, the fact that the person charged has been called as a witness shall not of itself confer
               on the prosecution the right of reply. 106
               If  a witness, upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by him relative to the
               subject-matter of the cause, and inconsistent with his present testimony, does not distinctly admit
               that he has made such statement, proof may be given that he did in fact make it; but before such
               proof can be  given, the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the
               102  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 79(1)
               103  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 79(2)
               104  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 80(1)
               105  Guyana – Evidence Act Cap. 5:03, section 80(2)
               106  Jamaica – Evidence Act 1843, section 11
                                                                                                           34





