Page 370 - Magistrates Conference 2019
P. 370

inconsistent with the testimony being given by the witness, the court may, without proof that the
               witness is adverse, grant leave to that party to cross-examine the witness as to the statement and

                                                                                                        90
               the court may consider the cross-examination in determining whether the witness is adverse.



               Barbados

               Where evidence that a witness is biased or has a motive to be untruthful, has been convicted of

               an offence, including an offence against the law of a foreign country or made a prior inconsistent
               statement, is adduced, otherwise than from the witness, the credibility rule does not prevent the

                                                                                                    91
               admission or use of the evidence if the witness has denied the substance of the evidence.
               Where evidence that a witness is or was unable to be aware of matters to which his evidence

               relates or knowingly or recklessly made a false representation while under an obligation imposed
               by or under a law, including a law of a foreign country, to tell the truth is adduced, otherwise

               than from the witness, the credibility rule does not prevent the admission or use of the evidence
                                                               92
               if the circumstance set out in subsection (3) exist.

               The circumstances referred to in subsection (2) are that the witness has denied the substance of
                                                                                   93
               the evidence and that the court has given leave to adduce the evidence.


               Belize

               A witness under cross-examination may be  asked whether he has made  any former statement
               relative to the subject-matter of the cause or matter and inconsistent with his present testimony,

               the circumstances of the supposed statement  being  referred to sufficiently to designate the

               particular occasion and, if he does not distinctly admit that he has made that statement, proof
                                                      94
               may be given that he did in fact make it.






               90  Antigua and Barbuda – The Evidence (Special Provisions) Act No. 5 of 2009, section 10(4)
               91  Barbados – Evidence Act Cap. 121, section 96(1)
               92  Barbados – Evidence Act Cap. 121, section 96(2)
               93  Barbados – Evidence Act Cap. 121, section 96(3)
               94  Belize – Evidence Act Cap. 95, section 71(1)
                                                                                                           31
   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375