Page 58 - EW July 2021 final
P. 58

International News




               CHINA                                             A spokeswoman for The Lancet says that Dr. Daszak
             Lab leak theory revival                           “is one of the world’s leading experts on zoonotic diseases,

                                                               including Coronaviruses, with experience of working in
                                                               China” and that his task force would assess “all leading
                                                               hypotheses” including “laboratory release”. Daszak did not
                                                               respond to a request for comment.
                                                                 Rossana Segreto, a former researcher at the University of
                                                               Innsbruck, says that in January The Lancet rejected a letter
                                                               by her and colleagues calling for an “open scientific debate”
                                                               about the origins of the virus. A spokeswoman for the jour-
                                                               nal says it does not comment on unpublished papers.
                                                                 Dr. Segreto also points a critical finger at Nature Medi-
                                                               cine, which in March 2020 added an ‘editors’ note’ to a 2015
                                                               paper documenting the creation of a “chimeric virus” from
                                                               a bat coronavirus in work done in collaboration with WIV.
                                                               The note emphasises that there is “no evidence” Corona-
                                                               virus was engineered. But this 2015 paper, critics argue, is
             Wuhan Institute of Virology: more openness call   exactly the kind of research that could lead to a risky new
                                                               virus, and the paper itself has been tweeted tens of thou-
                    JUST A MONTH AGO, THE IDEA THAT Coro-      sands of times.
                    navirus came from an accidental lab leak in Wu-  Several prestige journals have also rehabilitated the lab
                    han was derided by much of the press as a fringe   leak theory, not just thrown cold water over it. A turning
             conspiracy theory and banned on Facebook as a form of   point in the theory’s credibility came on May 14, when Sci-
             misinformation. Now, a host of distinguished scientists in-  ence published a letter signed by 18 eminent Coronavirus
             cluding Anthony Fauci, the US White House’s chief medical   experts arguing that the leak was a “viable” theory.
             adviser, credit the idea as plausible, if far from proven, and   This was not the result of a change of policy by the jour-
             are calling for more openness from the lab at the centre of   nal to start taking the leak theory seriously, says Holden
             the theory, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).  Thorp, editor-in-chief of the Science family of journals.
                Journalists who have rehabilitated the lab leak theory   “This letter was signed by important figures in the Covid
             in recent months point the finger at The Lancet for allow-  story, and we decided to publish it. We didn’t get anything
             ing Peter Daszak, president of research funder EcoHealth   prior to this that made it through our process,” he says.
             Alliance, to squash notions of a lab leak early on — without   Magdalena Skipper, editor-in-chief of Nature, says the
             disclosing that he had a significant potential conflict of in-  Science letter is a “very legitimate call” for further investiga-
             terest.                                           tion, and that no discussions about the origin of the virus
                In February 2020, just as the Western world was waking   had been “taboo” at Nature. She is “puzzled as to why we’re
             up to the pandemic’s spread, Dr. Daszak, a British zoologist   having (the debate) again in the absence of new evidence”.
             who has become a controversial central figure in the ori-
             gins debate, organised and signed a letter — along with the   Soft power failure
             who’s who of pandemic experts — in The Lancet to “strongly
             condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid-19 does   NTERNATIONAL STUDENTS ARE INCREASINGLY
             not have a natural origin”. The letter has been mentioned   fearful that their hopes of securing a degree from a Chi-
             in news stories more than 350 times so far.       Inese university will be dashed by the country’s 16-month
                But nowhere did The Lancet disclose a critical fact —     entry ban. The challenges faced by the thousands of regis-
             Daszak had funded and worked with WIV researchers for   tered students trapped outside China during the Corona-
             years to collect bat coronaviruses from the wild — in order   virus pandemic have been compounded by a lack of flex-
             to get ahead of them before they spread to humans — and   ibility on degree time limits, publishing requirements and
             led National Institutes of Health-funded work on, among   accreditation transfer. Many of the students involved are
             other things, “virus infection experiments across a range of   from Asia and Africa, and a large proportion are medical
             cell cultures from different species and humanised mice” to   students or postgraduate researchers in science and engi-
             assess how they might spread.                     neering subjects.
                “If the SARS2 virus had indeed escaped from research   One poll conducted in early June by the China Interna-
             he funded, Daszak would be potentially culpable. This acute   tional Student Union (CISU) found that 75 percent of over-
             conflict of interest was not declared to The Lancet’s read-  seas students now have a more negative view of China. A key
             ers,” says an investigation into the theory published by the   problem cited by 65 percent of respondents is that China’s
             Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists in early May.   degree time limits are inflexible and “unmeetable,” given

             58    EDUCATIONWORLD   JULY 2021
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63