Page 214 - Was Hitler a Riddle?
P. 214

Conclusion















            even today, sixty-five years after the defeat of Hitler, at a time when vast
            amounts of archival documents on the 1930s and early 1940s as well as auto-
            biographies of statesmen and generals who participated in the major events
            of those years are available, questions are still being raised about the true
            nature of Nazism. Were the diplomats examined in this study still alive,
            they might well be amazed to discover that despite all their reports on al-
            most every aspect of social and political developments in Germany during
            the 1930s, scholars still cannot agree on Hitler’s aims, the sources of his
            ideology, or the overall historical significance of Nazism’s destructive poli-
            cies. it would seem to them that, despite their best efforts, they had failed
            to solve the question posed by sir Maurice Hankey in October 1933, when
            he declared that Hitler was a riddle whose goals and conduct could not be
            divined.
              in  an  issue  of  the  American  Historical  Review  published  in  2010,  the
            scholar a. dirk Moses indicated just how divided professional historians
            still are on the subject of National socialism. Moses lauded a new school
            of interpretation of Nazism that considers it a mistake “to insist upon the
            centrality of antisemitism in the Nazi project” and believes it should be
            acknowledged that the Holocaust “is not that defining an experience after
            all.” instead, Nazism should be viewed as a political movement whose “real
            transgression” was not “genocide per se” but, rather, “the importation into
            europe of brutal colonial rule over non-europeans.”  this interpretation
                                                         1
            amounts to a partial revival of the thesis advanced by Hannah arendt in
            1951 in her influential book The Origins of Totalitarianism, where she argued
            that imperialism was one of the main sources of totalitarian movements in
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219