Page 209 - Was Hitler a Riddle?
P. 209

196  The American Diplomats

              the United states of a large Jewish community that frequently expressed its
              horror at Nazi persecutions of co-religionists and called on the roosevelt
              administration to protest Nazi policies no doubt played a role in stimulat-
              ing the diplomats to focus on the mistreatment of Jews. But their concen-
              tration on this subject also suggests that the diplomats realized that they
              were describing a regime unique in the twentieth century. their perspicac-
              ity would become fully evident only a few years after they left Germany,
              when the Nazi assault on the Jews turned into what is now known as the
              Holocaust.
                the american diplomats were less comprehensive and less insightful in
              their reporting on Hitler’s foreign political goals. they paid less attention
              than their British and French colleagues to the significance of Hitler’s with-
              drawal from the league of Nations, his program of rapid rearmament, his
              march into the rhineland, his annexations of austria, and even his march
              into Czechoslovakia. this is not to say that the american diplomats en-
              tirely ignored these matters or that they expressed no apprehension about
              the Nazis’ expansionist ambitions. as noted, ambassador dodd pointed to
              some dangerous signs of bellicosity in Nazi policies and statements. and
              in a letter of June 9, 1934, raymond Geist, who was outraged by Nazi
              domestic policies, wrote a letter to Jay Pierrepont Moffat, the chief of the
              division of Western european affairs in the department of state, warning
              that Germany “would certainly rearm and definitely prepare to wage a war
              against europe in general, which would change the course of history, if not
              of civilization beyond what we even dream, if their supreme effort would
              be successful.” 133  But these were relatively isolated comments.
                this  stance  of american  diplomats  no  doubt  reflected  the  prevailing
              views in the upper circles of the government and of large sectors of public
              opinion. during the first five years of the third reich, from 1933 to 1938,
              President roosevelt tended to downplay the danger of Nazism. He dis-
              paraged its ideology and privately referred to Hitler as a “madman” who
              would never be able to revive the German economy. When he was pre-
              sented with a copy of Mein Kampf in 1933, he read it in english although
              he knew German, and concluded that the translation was so shoddy that it
              could not be considered an accurate rendering of Hitler’s views; the “origi-
              nal would make a very different story.” the president believed that Hitler
              only wanted to persuade the West to agree to strike out the clauses in the
              treaty of Versailles that Germany found most objectionable, which could
              be achieved, in roosevelt’s view, by negotiation. Only in the fall of 1938,
              when Hitler made demands on Czechoslovakia for territorial concessions,
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214