Page 136 - Eclipse of God
P. 136

God and the Spirit of Man  109

            religion. In it the “I” of this relation steps ever more into the
            foreground as “subject” of “religious feeling,” as profiter from a
            pragmatist decision to believe, and the like.
               Much more important than all this, however, is an event
            penetrating to the innermost depth of the religious life, an
            event which may be described as the subjectivizing of the act
            of faith itself. Its essence can be grasped most clearly through
            the example of prayer.
               We call prayer in the pregnant sense of the term that speech
            of man to God which, whatever else is asked, ultimately asks
            for the manifestation of the divine Presence, for this Presence’s
            becoming dialogically perceivable. The single presupposition of
            a genuine state of prayer is thus the readiness of the whole man
            for this Presence, simple turned- towardness, unreserved spon-
            taneity. This spontaneity, ascending from the roots, succeeds
            time and again in overcoming all that disturbs and diverts. But
            in this our stage of subjectivized reflection not only the con-
            centration of the one who prays, but also his spontaneity is
            assailed. The assailant is consciousness, the over- consciousness
            of this man here that he is praying, that he is praying, that he
            is praying. And the assailant appears to be invincible.  The
            subjective knowledge of the one turning- towards about his
            turning- towards, this holding back of an I which does not
            enter into the action with the rest of the person, an I to which
            the action is an object— all this depossesses the moment, takes
            away its spontaneity. The specifically modern man who has not
            yet let go of God knows what that means: he who is not pres-
            ent perceives no Presence.
               One must understand this correctly: this is not a question
            of a special case of the known sickness of modern man, who
            must attend his own actions as spectator. It is the confession
            of the Absolute into which he brings his unfaithfulness to the
            Absolute, and it is the relation between the Absolute and him
   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141