Page 137 - Eclipse of God
P. 137

110 Chapter 8

               upon which this unfaithfulness works, in the middle of the
               statement of trust. And now he too who is seemingly holding
               fast to God becomes aware of the eclipsed Transcendence.
                 What is it that we mean when we speak of an eclipse of
               God which is even now taking place? Through this metaphor
               we make the tremendous assumption that we can glance up to
               God with our “mind’s eye,” or rather being’s eye, as with our
               bodily eye to the sun, and that something can step between
               our existence and His as between the earth and the sun. That
               this glance of the being exists, wholly unillusory, yielding no
               images yet first making possible all images, no other court in
               the world attests than that of faith. It is not to be proved; it is
               only to be experienced; man has experienced it. And that other,
               that which steps in between, one also experiences, to- day. I
               have spoken of it since I have recognized it, and as exactly as
               my perception allowed me.
                 The double nature of man, as the being that is both brought
               forth from “below” and sent from “above,” results in the duality
               of his basic characteristics. These cannot be understood through
               the categories of the individual man existing- for- himself, but
               only through the categories of his existing as man- with- man.
               As a being who is sent, man exists over against the existing
               being before which he is placed. As a being who is brought
               forth, he finds himself beside all existing beings in the world,
               beside which he is set. The first of these categories has its living
               reality in the relation I- Thou, the second has its reality in the
               relation I- It. The second always brings us only to the aspects of
               an existing being, not to that being itself. Even the most inti-
               mate contact with another remains covered over by an aspect if
               the other has not become Thou for me. Only the first relation,
               that which establishes essential immediacy between me and
               an existing being, brings me just thereby not to an aspect of
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142