Page 94 - Student: dazed And Confused
P. 94

Editor's  report









               ed-it  1  Q   Pronunciation  Key  (ed  h )
                tr.v.  ed-it-ed, ed-it-ing, ed-its


                   1.
                          a.  To  prepare  (written  m aterial) for publication  or  presentation,  as  by
                              correcting,  revising,  or adapting.
                          b.  To  prepare  an  edition  of for  publication:  edit a collection of short stories.
                          c.  To  m odify or adapt so  as to  make  suitable  or acceptable:  edited her remarks
                             for presentation to a younger audience.

                   2.  To  supervise the  publication  of (a  new spaper or  m agazine, for exam ple).
                   3.  To  assem ble the  com ponents of (a  film  or soundtrack,  for exam ple),  as  by cutting
                       and  splicing.
                   4.  To  elim inate;  delete: edited the best scene out.




                       O ur task for this  module  was to  produce  an  anthology of poetry and  prose  sent  in  by
               students on  the  course.  It got off to quite  a  rocky start and  I  do  not  believe  it  has  been  well
               organised  as there  has  been  much  confusion  on  all  fronts since  beginning.
                       W e  were  all  sent a  batch  of poetry written  by the  other group  and  either those  of
               the year above  or below  us.  W e  had  to shortlist our favourite ten from  the  bunch.  I  found
               this quite  difficult as  none  of them   really struck  me  as  being  better than the  rest  (a  num ber
               struck  me  as worse)  or as  having  more  m erit than  the  others.  Som e  of us  had  agreed  that
               we  would  try to grade them   on  how technically accurate they were.  This  has  been  said  to

                be  a  good  short-listing technique  but  I  thought  it was a  bit stupid  som etim es.  We  all  had
               our own  ideas about the  criteria  pieces  had  to  meet to  be  in  selection  but  I  didn't think any
               of them   met every single  one.  Everyone  else  seem ed  to  have found  som e though,  and  I
               guess  m ajority  rules.  Then,  when  each  small  selection  group  had  decided  their  list,  the
               w hole  cohort  re-gathered  to decide  on  a joint selection.  The  whole  process was  much
                lengthier and  drawn  out than  it should  have  been  and  I  still  have  no  idea  why  it  had  to  be  so
               com plicated.  If this  is what  professional  editors and  adjudicators  have to go through  to get
               their wage  slip then  I  feel  terribly sorry for them .  It can't  be  a  pleasant job.

                       One  or two of the  pieces  I  liked  made  it onto the first selection  list,  but  I  was finding
                it  necessary to fall  back on  personal  preference  where  people  seem ed  to  have found
               som ething of note,  but one  or two eventually  made  it onto the final  list.  Choosing the
                included  pieces was  not easy  but  it was a  drop  in  the  ocean  com pared  to the  editing.  Even
               when  we finalised  the  list,  it was  not definite  as we  kept changing our  m inds about which
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99