Page 401 - วารสารกฎหมาย ศาลอุทธรณ์คดีชํานัญพิเศษ
P. 401

ฉบับพิเศษ ประจำ�ปี 2564



            not subject to reciprocity, their regime will be applicable to every insolvency proceeding
            opened abroad, including EU Member States.

                    The second available mechanism is section 426 Insolvency Act 1986, which is

            entitled ‘Cooperation between courts exercising jurisdiction in relation to insolvency’.
            The main provision is subsection 426(4), according to which the courts having
            jurisdiction in relation to insolvency law in any part of the United Kingdom shall assist

            the courts having the corresponding jurisdiction in any other part of the United Kingdom
            or any relevant country or territory. With the exception of the Republic of Ireland,

            EU Member States are not considered ‘relevant country or territory’. This category is
            reserved primarily to Commonwealth countries and other jurisdictions with insolvency
            law regimes similar to English law.  Despite the width of the assistance potentially
                                               40
            available under this section, it will be necessary to widen its territorial scope if it is to
            be of use after Brexit.

                    The last resource to cooperate with foreign insolvencies is the common law
            principle of modified universalism, which can be seen as a derivation of the traditional
            notion of comity towards the courts and laws of other jurisdictions.  According to the
                                                                             41
            well-known words of Lord Hoffman, modified universalism is a ‘primary rule of private
            international law […], which has been the golden thread running through English

            cross-border insolvency law since the 18th century’.  It requires that English courts
                                                               42
            should, so far as is consistent with justice and UK public policy, co-operate with the
            courts in the country of the principal liquidation to ensure that all the company’s assets

            are distributed to its creditors under a single system of distribution.  Notwithstanding
                                                                             43
            this overarching declaration of intent, the application of the principle over the last decade


                    40  These include the Channel Islands, the Isle of Man, Anguilla, Australia, Bailiwick of Guernsey, (including
            Alderney and Sark), Bermuda, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Cayman Islands, Falkland Islands, Gibraltar, Hong Kong,
            Malaysia, Montserrat, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Republic of South Africa, St. Helena, The Bahamas, Turks
            and Caicos Islands, Tuvalu and Virgin Islands.
                    41  Credit Suisse Fides Trust v. Cuoghi [1998] QB 818, para. [17].
                    42  Re HIH Casualty & General Insurance Ltd [2008] UKHL 21, para. [30], which confirmed (also) Lord
            Hoffman’s approach in Cambridge Gas Transport Corp v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator
            Holding plc [2006] UKPC 26.
                    43  Ibid.



                                                                                             399
   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406