Page 21 - Microsoft Word - RYA Guidance - Misconduct a Reference for Race Officials (ex covers) - 01 13 v2.docx
P. 21

34.1   The protest committee feels it did not receive enough evidence on a particular
                              point

                              If the point  is central to the issue,  the committee is not entitled to find the
                              competitor guilty.  It must obtain the evidence needed before proceeding.

                              If the point is not central to the question of misconduct, the committee must
                              consider to what extent it is relevant to the question of guilt.

                              If the committee feels the point is irrelevant to the question of guilt, then it can
                              proceed.

                              If the point is relevant, then more evidence must be received before
                              proceeding

                       34.2   The protest committee discovers evidence of another incident of misconduct

                              Evidence of other misconduct is not to be considered as evidence meaning
                              the competitor committed the original misconduct under investigation.   The
                              two are separate allegations and a fresh rule 69 process must be carried out
                              in relation to the new misconduct.

                              Similarly, the fact that a competitor has committed misconduct in the past is
                              not evidence that the competitor did so again.

                       34.3   The competitor has alleged the investigation of the  misconduct and the
                              hearing has been biased or improperly carried out
                              If the  committee is  satisfied it has carried out an unbiased and thorough
                              process, then it can proceed.  If not, then it must either conduct the process
                              afresh or send a report to the RYA under rule 69.3 if it is unable to remedy the
                              defects in the process.

                       34.4   The competitor threatens legal action against the committee

                              Whilst potentially disturbing to the individual committee members, the threat
                              of legal action should not deter a protest committee.  Provided the rules are
                              followed and the competitor is accorded a fair and impartial hearing, there is
                              limited recourse in law to the courts in the  UK.   The chairman should
                              acknowledge the threat and record it but proceed.

                              It is essential that the rules and guidance are followed to the letter and a
                              thorough record made of the proceedings.  Using the checklist in Appendix C
                              will help achieve this.

                              If time permits, the protest committee should speak to the RYA Racing or
                              Legal Departments and seek advice there.
















               January 2013                                                                            20
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26