Page 132 - Judge Manual 2017
P. 132

and attendance at interviews should be made mandatory as a rule in the Notice
                       of Race. The Commission Member will draw up the interview list in consultation
                       with the event organizers or class and publish it on the official notice board.
                       Interviews  usually  take  place  before  registration  closes  and  always  before
                       racing starts.


                       Interviews  are  initially  conducted  by  the  Commission  Member  alone.  If  the
                       Commission Member has reason to believe that a competitor's classification
                       might need to be changed, the interview will be suspended and the competitor
                       called back for a second interview. The second interview is then conducted in
                       the presence of a witness and it is usual for the Commission Member to ask
                       one of the Jury members to be this witness. If asked to do so (and if you agree),
                       the role of the judge is just to take an independent note of the interview. At the
                       end,  the  Commission  Member  will  announce  his  or  her  decision  to  the
                       competitor.

                       Competitors can appeal against a decision to re-classify them, but this must be
                       done online and it is rare for this to take less than a month. Until then, the Code
                       states that the decision of the Commission Member at the event is binding. The
                       competitor cannot request redress as the Commission is not covered by RRS
                       62.1(a) and has no other redress procedure.

               O.4  Protests

                       A boat may be protested after the Crew Deadline and before the Classification
                       Protest Time Limit (or 24 hours after a changed Crew List is posted) if:

                   •  information, which would have led to a higher classification, was not disclosed
                      when a competitor applied for a classification; or

                   •  a competitor has, since being classified, engaged in activities incompatible
                      with his classification;

                       and in either case, the boat would then break the crew limitations in the Notice
                       of Race, Sailing Instructions or Class Rules.


                       These  types  of  protest  are  difficult  and  will  need  close  liaison  with  the
                       Commission.  The  protest  committee  will  also  need  to  consider  the  types  of
                       Group 3 activity (see World Sailing Regulation 22.2.2 for the list of activities) in
                       the  Code  and  how  to  best  assess  if  a  competitor  falls  into  one  of  these
                       categories.

                       The FAQs issued by the Commission can be very helpful in applying these to
                       different situations.   www.sailing.org/classification/

                       The Commission can give an indication of the types of questions and
                       evidence that should be presented.

                       As with measurement protests, where the protest committee is in doubt as to
                       the classification of a competitor, a protest committee can refer the facts found
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137