Page 7 - Bitter Icons
P. 7

As the excess deaths suggest, however, the Holodomor’s “murder by starvation” remains

                     the single  greatest catastrophe endured by Ukraine during Soviet rule. Any attempt to re-
                     construct a national  Ukrainian  narrative must take a stand on a trauma of such propor-
                     tions—especially  since all  Soviet historians,  propagandists,  and officials  assiduously  ig-

                     nored the famine or dismissed it as an émigré delusion for decades. Unsurprisingly,  the first
                     Ukrainians to draw attention to the tragedy of the Holodomor were survivors who had fled

                     to the West. (Motyl 2010:27)


               The  Holodomor  for these  various  reasons  has perhaps still  not been thoroughly  manifested  in
               the  international  or public  memory,  but  it  is  a very  important  issue  for  Ukraine’s  collective

               memory  and nationality.  On the other hand, we can assume that Robert Conquests groundbreak-
               ing  work from  1986 created a wider awareness  of the Holodomor  and the question  of genocide

               and as of  today there  exists  over  twenty  thousand  scholarly  titles  on the  topic  (Kulʹchytsʹkyi

               2015).


               On a further  note of the repression  of the Holodomor  memory  we know that the Soviet  regime

               for a long  period made sure there barely  existed any public  or collective  memories  of the famine
               and Conquest  (1986) also shows us that  importance  of Western  journalists  that  also partook in

               covering  up and of denying  the famine  at the time  it  was taking  place. We see thus,  that there
               existed  and to some degree still  exists  a kind  of conflict  of memory  on both sides of the camps.

               When I refer to the wo camps I refer to the Western capitalistic  and pro-Ukrainian  camp on the
               one side and Russia  on the other  side. This  is  of course of the highest  importance  for the Ho-

               lodomor  memory,  because  if  there  exist  such  conflicting  views  it  that  could  create  a barrier

               which  makes it much  more complicated  to establish  it as a global  memory.  But the thing  is that
               memory  of the Holodomor  is  not still  not part of the  global  memory,  but perhaps the  creation

               of a film  like  Bitter Harvest could  make it more established  as such.


               Transnational Memories, International Icons and the Holocaust as Model
               How then  does all  this  affect  the memory  construction  of the Holodomor  in  relation  to the film

               Bitter Harvest? I think  it is of importance  that we take the background  of suppression  and dis-

               tortion  of the Holodomor  memory  into  consideration  in context  of the film.  We can for instance
               see these aspects of repression  of the Holodomor  in the example  of the Holocaust.  In her article

               The Holocaust – A Global Memory Astrid  Erll  points  to Enzo  Travetso,  which  notes  that  the



                                                            6
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10