Page 255 - Eden Meadow 35 houses application as of 12 October
P. 255

Land to the Rear of Eden Meadows                                 Alison Peters – Consultee Response



            3.0  ALISON PETERS – CONSULTEE RESPONSE



            3.1     The  following  section  sets  out  each  comment  provided  from  Alison  Peters  in  relation  to  the
                    Building for Life Criteria and where relevant to landscape and visual matters, and a response
                    in turn.


                           “1/Connections…internal connectivity is not provided…”


            3.2     An additional footpath connection has been provided in the revised scheme layout.


                           “2/Facilities   and    services…play     provision,    in   particular
                           provisions for toddler play areas along with a bench, should be
                           provided…”


            3.3     It is the intention to provide suitable play equipment and appropriate street furniture within
                    the central open space of the Site.


                           5/Character…reference  has  not  been  made  to  the  local
                           Landscape  Character  in  the  landscape  strategy.  The  landscape
                           should  be  described  in  terms  of  the  local  study  for  local
                           landscapes, habitats and plant species”


            3.4     The  original  LVIA  submission  and  accompanying  landscape  strategy  and  planting  schedule
                    made explicit reference to the local landscape character guidance, with a species mix  of local
                    provenance  included  within  the  planting  schedule.  Additional  detail  is  provided  within  the
                    Landscape Strategy Principles Document.


                           “6/Context…the  site  should  respond  more  positively  with
                           regards  softening  the  village  boundary  with  appropriate
                           vegetation”


            3.5     The revised scheme layout incorporates deeper buffer along the boundaries that enable the
                    creation of a softer edge to the settled area.


                           “6/Context…more detail is required with regards the responses
                           to the local landscape context such as habitats and species”.


            3.6     Please  refer  to  the  original  Planting  Schedule  and  LBMS  that  accompanied  the  original
                    submission, and the revised versions that take into account changes to the scheme layout . As

                    stated  above  the  species  chosen  are  heavily  focussed  on  species  of  local  provenance  and
                    therefore do take into account the local landscape context.


                           “11/Clarity  of  public/private  spaces…more  information  is
                           required regarding the landscape design proposals which are to
                           be cognisant of the Landscape Character Area assessment. The
                           landscape proposals are broadbrush at this stage.



            27912/A5/GM                                      4                                  September 2020
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260