Page 121 - JoFA_2022
P. 121

TAX MATTERS









         Don’t try this at home                                             Eagle coins constituted taxable distri-

         Gold coins kept in taxpayer’s                                      butions equal to their purchase price,
         residence caused taxable IRA                                       finding that McNulty possessed the
         distributions.                                                     coins despite their purported ownership
                                                                            by Green Hill. McNulty argued that the
         A taxpayer’s physical possession of gold                           coins were assets of Green Hill and that
         coins purchased with her individual                                she did not use them, so her physical
         retirement account (IRA) caused her to                             receipt of them did not constitute tax-
         have taxable distributions from the IRA,                           able IRA distributions.
         the Tax Court held.              IRA and coins she and her husband   The Service further contended that
           Facts: In 2015, Donna McNulty   purchased directly.              McNulty violated the statute’s prohibi-
         purchased IRA services through the   McNulty’s joint returns with her   tion against commingling IRA assets,
         website of Check Book IRA by which   husband for the two years were prepared   which caused taxable distributions of
         she established a self-directed IRA that   by a CPA, but they did not consult the   the coins when they were stored in the
         was the sole member of Green Hill   CPA about the tax reporting of their   home safe, even if the Tax Court were to
         Holdings LLC. Check Book advertised   IRAs or physical possession of the coins.   conclude McNulty’s physical possession
         on its website that such an LLC could   In 2018, the IRS issued the McNultys a   of the coins did not. McNulty countered
         invest in American Eagle gold coins that   notice of deficiency, determining in part   that because she labeled the coins as
         the IRA’s owner could then hold at his   that McNulty had distributions equal   purchased with IRA funds before putting
         or her home without tax consequences   to her American Eagle coins’ cost of   them in the home safe, she did not com-
         or penalties so long as the coins were   $374,000 in 2015 and $37,380 in 2016,   mingle them with other coins in the safe.
         titled to the LLC. American Eagle gold,   resulting in deficiencies of $250,558 and   Alternatively, McNulty argued that
         silver, platinum, and palladium coins are   $18,094, respectively. The IRS further   because Sec. 408(m)(3)(B) specifies
         produced by the U.S. Mint and sold by   proposed accuracy-related penalties under   that bullion must remain in the physi-
         authorized dealers.              Sec. 6662 based on these deficiencies.  cal possession of an IRA’s trustee, that
           McNulty named Kingdom Trust Co.,   Law and regulations: Under Sec.   requirement does not apply to coins
         an independent qualified custodian, as   408(h), a custodial account is treated   described in Sec. 408(m)(3)(A), includ-
         the IRA’s custodian. Green Hill’s articles   as a trust that can qualify as an IRA   ing the American Eagle coins. This, too,
         of incorporation named McNulty and   under Sec. 408(a) if its assets are held   the IRS disputed.
         her husband as its managers and their   by a bank (as defined by Sec. 408(n)) or   As for the penalties, the McNultys
         personal residence as its principal place   another person who demonstrates to the   argued that their research of the
         of business. The couple also both had   IRS’s satisfaction that the person will   IRA/LLC structure and their use of
         signatory authority over Green Hill’s   administer the account consistently with   Check Book’s advice and service in
         bank account.                    Sec. 408’s requirements, in which case the   setting it up, along with unclear IRS
           McNulty authorized direct trans-  custodian can be treated as the account’s   guidance respecting physical possession
         fers to her IRA of $378,487 from an   trustee, as further delineated in Regs.   of coins, demonstrated they attempted
         individual retirement annuity in 2015   Sec. 1.408-2(e). IRA assets cannot be   to comply with the law, constituting a
         and of $48,375 from a Sec. 401(k) plan   commingled with other property except   reasonable-cause defense.
         in 2016 and directed Kingdom Trust to   in a common trust fund or common   Holding: McNulty’s physical custody
         use those funds to purchase member-  investment fund (Sec. 408(a)(5)).   of the American Eagle coins gave her
         ship interests in Green Hill. She then   Sec. 408(m) forbids IRAs from invest-  unfettered control over them, resulting
         had Green Hill use most of the funds   ing in certain items designated as collect-  in taxable IRA distributions, the Tax
         to purchase American Eagle coins from   ibles, including at Sec. 408(m)(2)(D) “any   Court held. Despite the LLC’s formal
         an authorized dealer. The coins’ invoices   stamp or coin,” with an exception under   interposition and although she did not
         listed Green Hill as the purchaser, but   Sec. 408(m)(3) for certain gold, silver, or   use the coins, she was free to do so
         the shipping labels identified McNulty   platinum coins or bullion “if such bullion   however she might have chosen. The
         and/or her IRA as the recipient. The coins  is in the physical possession of a trustee”   court found that McNulty’s arguments   IMAGES BY YURIY ALTUKHOV/ISTOCK
         were shipped to McNulty’s home, where   of the IRA (Sec. 408(m)(3)(B)).   to the contrary would create a situation
         she stored them in a safe along with coins   Issues: The IRS contended that   “ripe for abuse” that would subvert Sec.
         purchased by her husband’s self-directed   McNulty’s receipt of the American   408’s fiduciary requirements. “Personal

         28    |   Journal of Accountancy                                                           March 2022
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126